More than any other early modern text, Montaigne's Essais have come to be associated with the emergence of a distinctively modern subjectivity, defined in opposition to the artifices of language and social performance. Felicity Green challenges this interpretation with a compelling revisionist reading of Montaigne's text, centred on one of his deepest but hitherto most neglected preoccupations: the need to secure for himself a sphere of liberty and independence that he can properly call his own, or himself. Montaigne and the Life of Freedom restores the Essais to its historical context by examining the sources, character and significance of Montaigne's project of self-study. That project, as Green shows, reactivates and reshapes ancient practices of self-awareness and self-regulation, in order to establish the self as a space of inner refuge, tranquillity and dominion, free from the inward compulsion of the passions and from subjection to external objects, forces and persons.
总体来讲还是蛮有收获的,尤其是点出了几篇值得重点研究的篇目。但缺少哲学分析也的确是作为斯金纳的学生很难避免的一个问题。比如书中处处说到蒙田对于自由的考量是道德伦理性的,而非政治性的,但通篇却几乎没见到作者在解释自己在何种程度上使用moral和ethic这类词语
评分总体来讲还是蛮有收获的,尤其是点出了几篇值得重点研究的篇目。但缺少哲学分析也的确是作为斯金纳的学生很难避免的一个问题。比如书中处处说到蒙田对于自由的考量是道德伦理性的,而非政治性的,但通篇却几乎没见到作者在解释自己在何种程度上使用moral和ethic这类词语
评分总体来讲还是蛮有收获的,尤其是点出了几篇值得重点研究的篇目。但缺少哲学分析也的确是作为斯金纳的学生很难避免的一个问题。比如书中处处说到蒙田对于自由的考量是道德伦理性的,而非政治性的,但通篇却几乎没见到作者在解释自己在何种程度上使用moral和ethic这类词语
评分总体来讲还是蛮有收获的,尤其是点出了几篇值得重点研究的篇目。但缺少哲学分析也的确是作为斯金纳的学生很难避免的一个问题。比如书中处处说到蒙田对于自由的考量是道德伦理性的,而非政治性的,但通篇却几乎没见到作者在解释自己在何种程度上使用moral和ethic这类词语
评分总体来讲还是蛮有收获的,尤其是点出了几篇值得重点研究的篇目。但缺少哲学分析也的确是作为斯金纳的学生很难避免的一个问题。比如书中处处说到蒙田对于自由的考量是道德伦理性的,而非政治性的,但通篇却几乎没见到作者在解释自己在何种程度上使用moral和ethic这类词语
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有