发表于2024-12-18
Weird Realism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 哈曼 实在论 哲学 思辨实在论 speculative_turn
As Holderlin was to Martin Heidegger and Mallarme to Jacques Derrida, so is H.P. Lovecraft to the Speculative Realist philosophers. Lovecraft was one of the brightest stars of the horror and science fiction magazines, but died in poverty and relative obscurity in the 1930s. In 2005 he was finally elevated from pulp status to the classical literary canon with the release of a Library of America volume dedicated to his work. The impact of Lovecraft on philosophy has been building for more than a decade. Initially championed by shadowy guru Nick Land at Warwick during the 1990s, he was later discovered to be an object of private fascination for all four original members of the twenty-first century Speculative Realist movement. In this book, Graham Harman extracts the basic philosophical concepts underlying Lovecraft's work, yielding a "weird realism" capable of freeing continental philosophy from its current soul-crushing impasse. Abandoning Heidegger's pious references to Holderlin and the Greeks, Harman develops a new philosophical mythology centered in such Lovecraftian figures as Cthulhu, Wilbur Whately, and the rat-like monstrosity Brown Jenkin. The Miskatonic River replaces the Rhine and the Ister, while Holderlin's Caucasus gives way to Lovecraft's Antarctic mountains of madness.
哈曼的写作一向非常读者友好 喜欢这样平易的作者 此书是OOO的文学例证 启发、灵感颇多 只是分析得不是很优雅漂亮 不过从现有的作品里找到好的例证已经很不容易了 批评写作不能要求太高 姑且看作抛砖引玉 尤其对于创作者
评分忍无可忍的第二章,哈曼自己说要做一个intensive reading,但实际上非常的heavy。而且仅仅几处触及了Lovecraft的style,大部分还是content-laden。这种貌似模仿Brooks的文本细读,实际上没有任何指示性目的。本来想学学哈曼怎么用OOO结合文学文本,学到就是:绝对不能把文学批评写成这个样子!还拿Wilson作靶子,根本不在一个层面上对话。。。或者说,哈曼的目的偏向了证明Lovecraft并非一个pulp novelist...
评分忍无可忍的第二章,哈曼自己说要做一个intensive reading,但实际上非常的heavy。而且仅仅几处触及了Lovecraft的style,大部分还是content-laden。这种貌似模仿Brooks的文本细读,实际上没有任何指示性目的。本来想学学哈曼怎么用OOO结合文学文本,学到就是:绝对不能把文学批评写成这个样子!还拿Wilson作靶子,根本不在一个层面上对话。。。或者说,哈曼的目的偏向了证明Lovecraft并非一个pulp novelist...
评分哈曼的写作一向非常读者友好 喜欢这样平易的作者 此书是OOO的文学例证 启发、灵感颇多 只是分析得不是很优雅漂亮 不过从现有的作品里找到好的例证已经很不容易了 批评写作不能要求太高 姑且看作抛砖引玉 尤其对于创作者
评分忍无可忍的第二章,哈曼自己说要做一个intensive reading,但实际上非常的heavy。而且仅仅几处触及了Lovecraft的style,大部分还是content-laden。这种貌似模仿Brooks的文本细读,实际上没有任何指示性目的。本来想学学哈曼怎么用OOO结合文学文本,学到就是:绝对不能把文学批评写成这个样子!还拿Wilson作靶子,根本不在一个层面上对话。。。或者说,哈曼的目的偏向了证明Lovecraft并非一个pulp novelist...
Weird Realism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书