Plato versus Parmenides investigates the concept of genesis, or coming into being, a problem that has absorbed the greatest philosophical thinkers. Robert J. Roecklein explores two philosophical giants who tackled this issue: Plato and Parmenides from Elea. Particularly interesting to Roecklein is how the respective arguments of reality, or lack thereof, of coming into being functions as a political barometer: how Plato and Parmenides sketch foundations for political regimes. Plato and Parmenides, philosophers of immeasurable respect and influence, represented two sides of a fierce debate. On one side, Parmenides gives the famous argument that coming into being cannot possibly be a reality in nature. The other side, Plato proves in his dialogue the Parmenides that coming into being is a very real thing in nature. He argues that perception does indeed provide accurate information about the external world. In Plato versus Parmenides, Robert J. Roecklein presents the great debate between these two schools, and examines the disposition of other PreSocratic philosophers who were influenced by these great intellectual rivals.
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
If Parmenides' philosophy was all wrong, and yet at least he inspired Plato, than whom the age has seen no better.
评分If Parmenides' philosophy was all wrong, and yet at least he inspired Plato, than whom the age has seen no better.
评分If Parmenides' philosophy was all wrong, and yet at least he inspired Plato, than whom the age has seen no better.
评分If Parmenides' philosophy was all wrong, and yet at least he inspired Plato, than whom the age has seen no better.
评分If Parmenides' philosophy was all wrong, and yet at least he inspired Plato, than whom the age has seen no better.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有