发表于2024-12-25
Thinking the Impossible 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 哲学 英文版 思想史 literature Theory Philosophy French Derrida
The late 20th century saw a remarkable flourishing of philosophy in France. The work of French philosophers is wide ranging, historically informed, often reaching out beyond the boundaries of philosophy; they are public intellectuals, taken seriously as contributors to debates outside the academy. Gary Gutting tells the story of the development of a distinctively French philosophy in the last four decades of the 20th century. His aim is to arrive at an account of what it was to 'do philosophy' in France, what this sort of philosophizing was able to achieve, and how it differs from the analytic philosophy dominant in Anglophone countries. His initial focus is on the three most important philosophers who came to prominence in the 1960s: Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, and Jacques Derrida. He sets out the educational and cultural context of their work, as a basis for a detailed treatment of how they formulated and began to carry out their philosophical projects in the 1960s and 1970s. He gives a fresh assessment of their responses to the key influences of Hegel and Heidegger, and the fraught relationship of the new generation to their father-figure Sartre. He concludes that Foucault, Derrida, and Deleuze can all be seen as developing their fundamental philosophical stances out of distinctive readings of Nietzsche. The second part of the book considers topics and philosophers that became prominent in the 1980s and 1990s, such as the revival of ethics in Levinas, Derrida, and Foucault, the return to phenomenology and its use to revive religious experience as a philosophical topic, and Alain Badiou's new ontology of the event. Finally Gutting brings to the fore the meta-philosophical theme of the book, that French philosophy since the 1960s has been primarily concerned with thinking the impossible.
目录比正文丰富 系列。。。
评分Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
评分Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
评分Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
评分Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
Thinking the Impossible 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书