Hélène Landemore is assistant professor of political science at Yale University. She is the author of Hume: Probability and Reasonable Choice.
Individual decision making can often be wrong due to misinformation, impulses, or biases. Collective decision making, on the other hand, can be surprisingly accurate. In Democratic Reason, Hélène Landemore demonstrates that the very factors behind the superiority of collective decision making add up to a strong case for democracy. She shows that the processes and procedures of democratic decision making form a cognitive system that ensures that decisions taken by the many are more likely to be right than decisions taken by the few. Democracy as a form of government is therefore valuable not only because it is legitimate and just, but also because it is smart.
Landemore considers how the argument plays out with respect to two main mechanisms of democratic politics: inclusive deliberation and majority rule. In deliberative settings, the truth-tracking properties of deliberation are enhanced more by inclusiveness than by individual competence. Landemore explores this idea in the contexts of representative democracy and the selection of representatives. She also discusses several models for the "wisdom of crowds" channeled by majority rule, examining the trade-offs between inclusiveness and individual competence in voting. When inclusive deliberation and majority rule are combined, they beat less inclusive methods, in which one person or a small group decide. Democratic Reason thus establishes the superiority of democracy as a way of making decisions for the common good.
發表於2024-12-27
Democratic Reason 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 政治哲學 政治理論 政治學 英文原版 美國 社會科學 社會知識論 民主政治
不太確定怎麼打分其實... 有不少從premise開始就不是特別贊同的論述,就可能我心底不是特別認同Epistemic Democracy.... 但這本對於認識這套理論來說真的寫得非常的明白,跟教授聊起來的說法是「argue elegantly」給瞭我一個蠻好的認識。有幸聽瞭女神講座甚至擁有跟著教授蹭一起吃飯的機會,可惜在那之後纔比較明白地看瞭這本書,有不少疑惑不知道還有沒有機會問問。
評分不太確定怎麼打分其實... 有不少從premise開始就不是特別贊同的論述,就可能我心底不是特別認同Epistemic Democracy.... 但這本對於認識這套理論來說真的寫得非常的明白,跟教授聊起來的說法是「argue elegantly」給瞭我一個蠻好的認識。有幸聽瞭女神講座甚至擁有跟著教授蹭一起吃飯的機會,可惜在那之後纔比較明白地看瞭這本書,有不少疑惑不知道還有沒有機會問問。
評分不太確定怎麼打分其實... 有不少從premise開始就不是特別贊同的論述,就可能我心底不是特別認同Epistemic Democracy.... 但這本對於認識這套理論來說真的寫得非常的明白,跟教授聊起來的說法是「argue elegantly」給瞭我一個蠻好的認識。有幸聽瞭女神講座甚至擁有跟著教授蹭一起吃飯的機會,可惜在那之後纔比較明白地看瞭這本書,有不少疑惑不知道還有沒有機會問問。
評分不太確定怎麼打分其實... 有不少從premise開始就不是特別贊同的論述,就可能我心底不是特別認同Epistemic Democracy.... 但這本對於認識這套理論來說真的寫得非常的明白,跟教授聊起來的說法是「argue elegantly」給瞭我一個蠻好的認識。有幸聽瞭女神講座甚至擁有跟著教授蹭一起吃飯的機會,可惜在那之後纔比較明白地看瞭這本書,有不少疑惑不知道還有沒有機會問問。
評分不太確定怎麼打分其實... 有不少從premise開始就不是特別贊同的論述,就可能我心底不是特別認同Epistemic Democracy.... 但這本對於認識這套理論來說真的寫得非常的明白,跟教授聊起來的說法是「argue elegantly」給瞭我一個蠻好的認識。有幸聽瞭女神講座甚至擁有跟著教授蹭一起吃飯的機會,可惜在那之後纔比較明白地看瞭這本書,有不少疑惑不知道還有沒有機會問問。
Democratic Reason 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載