Andrew Walder is the Denise O'Leary and Kent Thiry Professor in the Department of Sociology at Stanford, where he is also a Senior Fellow in the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI). He is currently the Director of the Division of International, Comparative and Area Studies in Stanford’s School of Humanities and Sciences, and in past years has served as the Director of FSI’s Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center. He is the current Chair of Stanford’s Department of Sociology.
A political sociologist, Walder has long specialized on the sources of conflict, stability and change in communist regimes and their successor states. His current research focuses on changes in the ownership and control of large Chinese corporations and the parallel emergence of a new corporate elite with varied ties to state agencies. He also continues his research interest in Mao-era China, with a focus on the mass politics of the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1969.
Walder joined the Stanford faculty the fall of 1997. He received his Ph.D. in Sociology at the University of Michigan in 1981 and taught at Columbia University before moving to Harvard in 1987. As a Professor of Sociology, he served as Chair of Harvard’s M.A. Program on Regional Studies-East Asia for several years. From 1995 to 1997 he headed the Division of Social Sciences at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. From 1996 to 2006, as a member of the Hong Kong Government’s Research Grants Council, he chaired its Panel on the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Business Studies.
His recent publications include Fractured Rebellion: The Beijing Red Guard Movement (Harvard University Press, 2009), The Chinese Cultural Revolution as History, edited with Joseph Esherick and Paul Pickowicz (Stanford University Press, 2006), “Revolution, Reform, and Status Inheritance: Urban China 1949-1996," in American Journal of Sociology (2009), “Political Sociology and Social Movements,” in Annual Review of Sociology (2009), “Ownership, Organization, and Income Inequality: Market Transition in Rural Vietnam” in the American Sociological Review (2008), and “Ambiguity and Choice in Political Movements: The Origins of Beijing Red Guard Factionalism,” in the American Journal of Sociology (2006).
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/awalder/index.html
发表于2024-12-22
Communist Neo-traditionalism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
88年的列文森奖。比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但从现在的眼光看基本都是特设性的,理论...
评分88年的列文森奖。比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但从现在的眼光看基本都是特设性的,理论...
评分88年的列文森奖。比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但从现在的眼光看基本都是特设性的,理论...
评分88年的列文森奖。比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但从现在的眼光看基本都是特设性的,理论...
评分88年的列文森奖。比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但从现在的眼光看基本都是特设性的,理论...
图书标签: 社会学 组织社会学 海外中国研究 政治社会学 列文森中国研究书籍奖 Walder 海外中国研究丛书 政治学
Based on official Chinese sources as well as intensive interviews with Hong Kong residents formerly employed in mainland factories, Andrew Walder's neo-traditional image of communist society in China will be of interest not only to those concerned with China and other communist countries, but also to students of industrial relations and comparative social science.
比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但基本都是特设性的,理论推广性弱)的概念:principled particularism&clientelist bureaucracy (mixture of formal and informal ties)。最后的理论反思有启发性:用关系视角代替团体视角来分析社会结构;政治合法性在工厂内的三种建构途径(为什么工人不采取集体行动);现代工厂科层制的不同形态;八十年代的institutional continuity.
评分根据interview展开的一本书,主要观点有neo-traditionalism, principled particularism as well as clientelist bureaucracy,整体上运用的network analysis是我喜欢的方法!
评分中文条目没了,以前还有一个写得很好的书评,现在也没有了。
评分中文条目上周还有,这周就木得了……
评分比较视角的优秀运用是本书的一大优点,一方面是中苏美日的跨国比较,另一方面是民国(contractor & foreman)、建国到文革、文革、post-mao era(from asceticism to paternalism)的历时比较。提出了若干颇具解释力(但基本都是特设性的,理论推广性弱)的概念:principled particularism&clientelist bureaucracy (mixture of formal and informal ties)。最后的理论反思有启发性:用关系视角代替团体视角来分析社会结构;政治合法性在工厂内的三种建构途径(为什么工人不采取集体行动);现代工厂科层制的不同形态;八十年代的institutional continuity.
Communist Neo-traditionalism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书