发表于2024-08-22
The Architecture of Deconstruction 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 建筑设计 建筑理论 建筑 theory.architecture theory architecture-theory architecture
Nowhere, Mark Wigley asserts, are the stakes higher for deconstruction than in architecture - architecture is the Achilles' heel of deconstructive discourse, the point of vulnerability upon which all of its arguments -depend. In this book Wigley redefines the question of deconstruction and architecture. By locating the architecture already hidden within deconstructive discourse, he opens up more radical possibilities for both architecture and deconstruction, offering a way of rethinking the institution of architecture while using architecture to rethink deconstructive discourse.Wigley relentlessly tracks the tacit argument about architecture embedded within Jacques Derrida's discourse, a curious line of argument that passes through each of the philosopher's texts. He argues that this seemingly tenuous thread actually binds those texts, acting as their source of strength but also their point of greatest weakness. Derrida's work is seen to render architecture at once more complex, uncanny, pervasive, unstable, brutal, enigmatic, and devious, if not insidious, while needing itself to be subjected to an architectural interrogation.Wigley provocatively turns Derrida's reading strategy back on his texts to expose the architectural dimension of their central notions like law, economy, writing, place, domestication, translation, vomit, spacing, laughter, and dance. Along the way he highlights new aspects of the relationship between Heidegger and Derrida, explores the structural role of ornament and the elusive architecture of haunting, while presenting a fascinating account of the institutional politics of architecture.Mark Wigley is Assistant Professor in the School of Architecture at Princeton University.
好吧,不知道是不是因为Colomina的影响,Wigley整本书关于德里达的侧重点在House, 提出的哲学性的问题也是关于 haunt, spacing之类这些全都可以往house上联系的东西,还有什么dwelling还有海德格尔。看着看着我就能想起Colomina! 啊,总之和architecture 更宏观的解构和德里达的读物还是艾森曼更接近一点儿。
评分好吧,不知道是不是因为Colomina的影响,Wigley整本书关于德里达的侧重点在House, 提出的哲学性的问题也是关于 haunt, spacing之类这些全都可以往house上联系的东西,还有什么dwelling还有海德格尔。看着看着我就能想起Colomina! 啊,总之和architecture 更宏观的解构和德里达的读物还是艾森曼更接近一点儿。
评分好吧,不知道是不是因为Colomina的影响,Wigley整本书关于德里达的侧重点在House, 提出的哲学性的问题也是关于 haunt, spacing之类这些全都可以往house上联系的东西,还有什么dwelling还有海德格尔。看着看着我就能想起Colomina! 啊,总之和architecture 更宏观的解构和德里达的读物还是艾森曼更接近一点儿。
评分好吧,不知道是不是因为Colomina的影响,Wigley整本书关于德里达的侧重点在House, 提出的哲学性的问题也是关于 haunt, spacing之类这些全都可以往house上联系的东西,还有什么dwelling还有海德格尔。看着看着我就能想起Colomina! 啊,总之和architecture 更宏观的解构和德里达的读物还是艾森曼更接近一点儿。
评分好吧,不知道是不是因为Colomina的影响,Wigley整本书关于德里达的侧重点在House, 提出的哲学性的问题也是关于 haunt, spacing之类这些全都可以往house上联系的东西,还有什么dwelling还有海德格尔。看着看着我就能想起Colomina! 啊,总之和architecture 更宏观的解构和德里达的读物还是艾森曼更接近一点儿。
The Architecture of Deconstruction 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书