[英]A·布雷特(Annable Brett),剑桥大学历史学高级讲师,著有《自由、权利与自然:晚期经院哲学中的个人权利》等著作。
[加]詹姆斯·塔利(James Tully),维多利亚大学政治科学功勋教授,著有《语境中的洛克》、《陌生的多数》等。
[英]H·H·布利克利(Holly Hamilton-Bleakley),剑桥大学思想史和政治思想史博士,发表有关欧洲中世纪晚期道德与政治哲学方面的文章多篇。
胡传胜,历史学博士,江苏省社会科学院研究员,著有《自由的幻像:伯林思想研究》,译有《自由论》、《斯金纳思想研究》(合译)等。
邵怡,英国文学博士,现任职于南京财经大学外国语学院,曾译有多部论著出版。
发表于2024-12-28
Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
詹姆斯·塔利等著:《重思<近代政治思想的基础>》,胡传胜、邵怡译,华东师大出版社2010年版 Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,Cambridge University Press,2006 【按:这本书是斯金纳的开创性著作《近代政治思想的基础》(1978)出版三十年后...
评分詹姆斯·塔利等著:《重思<近代政治思想的基础>》,胡传胜、邵怡译,华东师大出版社2010年版 Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,Cambridge University Press,2006 【按:这本书是斯金纳的开创性著作《近代政治思想的基础》(1978)出版三十年后...
评分詹姆斯·塔利等著:《重思<近代政治思想的基础>》,胡传胜、邵怡译,华东师大出版社2010年版 Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,Cambridge University Press,2006 【按:这本书是斯金纳的开创性著作《近代政治思想的基础》(1978)出版三十年后...
评分詹姆斯·塔利等著:《重思<近代政治思想的基础>》,胡传胜、邵怡译,华东师大出版社2010年版 Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,Cambridge University Press,2006 【按:这本书是斯金纳的开创性著作《近代政治思想的基础》(1978)出版三十年后...
评分詹姆斯·塔利等著:《重思<近代政治思想的基础>》,胡传胜、邵怡译,华东师大出版社2010年版 Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,Cambridge University Press,2006 【按:这本书是斯金纳的开创性著作《近代政治思想的基础》(1978)出版三十年后...
图书标签: 政治哲学 思想史 二手文献 Tully Skinner Pocack
Quentin Skinner's classic study The Foundations of Modern Political Thought was first published by Cambridge in 1978. This was the first of a series of outstanding publications that have changed forever the way the history of political thought is taught and practised. Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought looks afresh at the impact of the original work, asks why it still matters, and considers a number of significant agendas that it still inspires. A very distinguished international team of contributors has been assembled, including John Pocock, RichardTuck and David Armitage, and the result is an unusually powerful and cohesive contribution to the history of ideas, of interest to large numbers of students of early modern history and political thought. In conclusion, Skinner replies to each chapter and presents his own thoughts on the latest trends and the future direction of the history of political thought.
It is possible that Skinner's historical intelligence is focused on the synchronic, the detailed reconstruction of language situations as they exist at a given times, whereas Pocock's leans to the diachronic, the study of what happens when languages change or texts migrate from one historical situation to another.
评分It is possible that Skinner's historical intelligence is focused on the synchronic, the detailed reconstruction of language situations as they exist at a given times, whereas Pocock's leans to the diachronic, the study of what happens when languages change or texts migrate from one historical situation to another.
评分It is possible that Skinner's historical intelligence is focused on the synchronic, the detailed reconstruction of language situations as they exist at a given times, whereas Pocock's leans to the diachronic, the study of what happens when languages change or texts migrate from one historical situation to another.
评分It is possible that Skinner's historical intelligence is focused on the synchronic, the detailed reconstruction of language situations as they exist at a given times, whereas Pocock's leans to the diachronic, the study of what happens when languages change or texts migrate from one historical situation to another.
评分It is possible that Skinner's historical intelligence is focused on the synchronic, the detailed reconstruction of language situations as they exist at a given times, whereas Pocock's leans to the diachronic, the study of what happens when languages change or texts migrate from one historical situation to another.
Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书