Michael Walzer (3 March 1935) is one of America's leading political philosophers. He is a professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and editor of Dissent, a left-wing quarterly of politics and culture. He has written on a wide range of topics, including just and unjust wars, nationalism, ethnicity, economic justice, social criticism, radicalism, tolerance, and political obligation. He is also a contributing editor to The New Republic and a member of the editorial board of Philosophy & Public Affairs. To date he has written 27 books and has published over 300 articles, essays, and book reviews. He is a member of several philosophical organizations including the American Philosophical Society.
Michael is the older brother of historian Judith Walzer Leavitt.
Walzer is usually identified as one of the leading proponents of the "Communitarian" position in political theory, along with Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Sandel. Like Sandel and MacIntyre, Walzer is not completely comfortable with this label. He has, however, long argued that political theory must be grounded in the traditions and culture of particular societies and opposed what he sees to be the excessive abstraction of political philosophy. His most important intellectual contributions include a revitalization of just war theory that insists on the importance of ethics in wartime while eschewing pacifism; the theory of "complex equality," which holds that the metric of just equality is not some single material or moral good, but rather that egalitarian justice demands that each good be distributed according to its social meaning, and that no good (like money or political power) be allowed to dominate or distort the distribution of goods in other spheres; and an argument that justice is primarily a moral standard within particular nations and societies, not one that can be developed in a universalized abstraction.
In April 2008, Walzer received the prestigious Spinoza Lens, a bi-annual prize for ethics in The Netherlands.
发表于2024-11-07
Spheres Of Justice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
翻译或许有点问题,拗口 写得真是不错啊。。。 很明白世事的作者,表述得也很清楚
评分《正义诸领域:为多元主义和平等一辩》 必需英文本对参。 这本书与Nozick的《无政府、国家和乌托邦》一样,源自Walzer和Nozick两人与1970-1971年在哈佛开的一门“资本主义与社会主义”的辩论课程。 这本书的一个特点是弥漫着历史感和睿智的洞见,对寻求一...
评分《正义诸领域:为多元主义和平等一辩》 必需英文本对参。 这本书与Nozick的《无政府、国家和乌托邦》一样,源自Walzer和Nozick两人与1970-1971年在哈佛开的一门“资本主义与社会主义”的辩论课程。 这本书的一个特点是弥漫着历史感和睿智的洞见,对寻求一...
评分自罗尔斯《正义论》一书出世后,正义成为政治哲学与伦理学的讨论的热点。其中沃尔泽的多元主义影响颇大,与罗尔斯和诺奇克分庭相抗。这本《正义诸理论——为多元主义与平等一辩》是他的代表作。 沃尔泽在本书中构建了与简单平等相对立的复合平等理论,复合平等理论是一个精...
评分翻译或许有点问题,拗口 写得真是不错啊。。。 很明白世事的作者,表述得也很清楚
图书标签: 政治哲学 Walzer 法律思想史 沃尔泽 政治 当代政治哲学 textbook Michael
Spheres of Justice, with the subtitle "In defence of pluralism and equality", is the title of a book written by Michael Walzer.
In it, Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice from 1971. The book might be considered an attempt, from a liberal starting point, to bridge some of the disagreements between liberals and communitarians in political philosophy.
行动中的历史主义。
评分只看了前面两章,作者的复杂正义理论强调social goods应该被分为不同的类别;而不同类别的social goods理应区别对待,包括它们如何分配,如何决定,谁来决定。罗尔斯的正义理论似乎没有特别说明social goods的不同属性问题。
评分对正义论的反驳和补充
评分只看了前面两章,作者的复杂正义理论强调social goods应该被分为不同的类别;而不同类别的social goods理应区别对待,包括它们如何分配,如何决定,谁来决定。罗尔斯的正义理论似乎没有特别说明social goods的不同属性问题。
评分一本很有趣也很奇怪的作品,一定是当代经典,因为1.具体写出了罗尔斯没能谈及的不同领域的正义分配原则;2.领域的划分虽然有的时候显得有些随机,但复杂平等和反支配与垄断的思路在框架上非常清晰;3.有非常具体的论证,加上不知道从哪儿来的一堆例子。奇怪的部分在于:1.整本书其实都没讨论结社的问题,而这似乎恰好是多元主义的核心议题,而结社的一个目的似乎就是跨越正义的领域表达诉求或者修订领域的边界;2.试图讨论正义问题,但其实缺乏一个明确的正义定义,因此使得领域的划分显得有些随意——为什么空闲时间是个正义而不是善的问题?;3.论证的方式试图给正反两方都足够的意见和处理,往往到最后变得结论不明确。沃尔泽追求流畅的文风的代价是很多论证因为过于依赖直觉而并不能称其为论证,不过结论而言,我似乎还和他蛮契合。
Spheres Of Justice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书