Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Austrian economist at the University of Vienna, and Austrian finance minister, made the modern intertemporal theory of interest rates possible in his work Capital and Interest. His second book in this series of two, The Positive Theory of Capital, continued on to study the accumulation and influences of capital, proposing an average period of production. This work on capital stood in contrast to the contemporaneous work of John Bates Clark on the marginal productivity of capital, and set off a great debate in economics. Although marginal productivity theory proved more accurate, Böhm-Bawerk's highlighting the importance of thinking clearly about interest rates and their intertemporal nature permanently changed economic theory. In the process, he also helped highlight errors in the economic foundations of socialism, as proposed by Rodbertus and Marx. Böhm-Bawerk was influenced by Carl Menger; Ludwig von Mises and Joseph Schumpeter were Böhm-Bawerk's students.
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, the great economist and finance minister of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, is a pillar of the Austrian School. As the champion of the then-emerging marginalist school, this great work brought him more fame than even Carl Menger had in his day.
Here is the original English translation, by Scottish economist William Smart, of Capital and Interest. This translation had a large impact on the American and British economic scene, and its treatment of the text retains its clarity and insight more than a century after its initial publication. This edition is the first that has been available in many years.
With depth and lucidity, Böhm-Bawerk surveys and critiques failed theories of interest from antiquity to modern times, presents a full theory of the structure of production, and defends the importance of capital in production and time in the determination of the interest rate.
The broad implications of this work are being rediscovered today by younger Austrians who are building on his foundation for Austrian production theory. Capital and Interest does not only address economics, however. As Mises said, this voluminous treatise is the royal road to understanding of the fundamental political issues of our age.
發表於2024-12-26
Capital and Interest 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
龐巴維剋對勞動價值論的批判很有價值,他先把馬剋思的論證結構給總結瞭齣來。馬剋思認為兩個物品價值相等,說明他們有共同的元素可以比較,這元素不能是使用價值,隻有勞動。隨後他一一批判瞭其問題。最經典的是用馬剋思的話來反駁他。馬剋思認為兩個物品之所以價值相等...
評分龐巴維剋的書駁倒瞭馬剋思的《資本論》嗎?不是反駁者的水平太差,而是經濟學傢自認為淩駕於政治學傢之上,卻不能撬動人類曆史階級鬥爭這個根本點,所謂學說自然流於數據和形式一流瞭。龐巴維剋無非也是這樣,隻不過說得尖銳些,另加我們有幸看得到。
評分龐巴維剋對勞動價值論的批判很有價值,他先把馬剋思的論證結構給總結瞭齣來。馬剋思認為兩個物品價值相等,說明他們有共同的元素可以比較,這元素不能是使用價值,隻有勞動。隨後他一一批判瞭其問題。最經典的是用馬剋思的話來反駁他。馬剋思認為兩個物品之所以價值相等...
評分龐巴維剋對勞動價值論的批判很有價值,他先把馬剋思的論證結構給總結瞭齣來。馬剋思認為兩個物品價值相等,說明他們有共同的元素可以比較,這元素不能是使用價值,隻有勞動。隨後他一一批判瞭其問題。最經典的是用馬剋思的話來反駁他。馬剋思認為兩個物品之所以價值相等...
評分龐巴維剋的書駁倒瞭馬剋思的《資本論》嗎?不是反駁者的水平太差,而是經濟學傢自認為淩駕於政治學傢之上,卻不能撬動人類曆史階級鬥爭這個根本點,所謂學說自然流於數據和形式一流瞭。龐巴維剋無非也是這樣,隻不過說得尖銳些,另加我們有幸看得到。
圖書標籤: 經濟 奧地利學派
Capital and Interest 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載