George Kubler (1912–1996) was Sterling Professor of the History of Art at Yale University. He is also author of The Art and Architecture of Ancient America (Yale).
When it was first released in 1962, The Shape of Time presented a radically new approach to the study of art history. Drawing upon new insights in fields such as anthropology and linguistics, George Kubler replaced the notion of style as the basis for histories of art with the concept of historical sequence and continuous change across time. Kubler’s classic work is now made available in a freshly designed edition.
“The Shape of Time is as relevant now as it was in 1962. This book, a sober, deeply introspective, and quietly thrilling meditation on the flow of time and space and the place of objects within a larger continuum, adumbrates so many of the critical and theoretical concerns of the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. It is both appropriate and necessary that it re-appear in our consciousness at this time.”—Edward J. Sullivan, New York University
This book will be of interest to all students of art history and to those concerned with the nature and theory of history in general. In a study of formal and symbolic durations the author presents a radically new approach to the problem of historical change. Using new ideas in anthropology and linguistics, he pursues such questions as the nature of time, the nature of change, and the meaning of invention. The result is a view of historical sequence aligned on continuous change more than upon the static notion of style—the usual basis for conventional histories of art.
發表於2024-12-28
The Shape of Time 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Kubler的《時間的形狀》(the Shape of Time)寫就於1962年病中。1960年代的藝術史在象徵學和形態學的兩極中搖擺。審美是形式還是意義,這是一個大大的問號。這個問題或許時至今日還未能解決。Kubler絕對不是要拋棄意義去做一個絕對的形式主義者。康德審美理論中沒有目的的目的性...
評分方聞的《心印》(Images of Mind)、徐小虎(Joan Stanley-Baker)的《被遺忘的真跡》以及巫鴻的《中國古代藝術與建築中的“紀念碑性”》幾本書都有一個鮮為人知的共通點——影響程度雖有所不同,但他們都先後引用到瞭George Kubler的這本The Shape of Time。在1963年齣版伊始...
評分Kubler的《時間的形狀》(the Shape of Time)寫就於1962年病中。1960年代的藝術史在象徵學和形態學的兩極中搖擺。審美是形式還是意義,這是一個大大的問號。這個問題或許時至今日還未能解決。Kubler絕對不是要拋棄意義去做一個絕對的形式主義者。康德審美理論中沒有目的的目的性...
評分Kubler的《時間的形狀》(the Shape of Time)寫就於1962年病中。1960年代的藝術史在象徵學和形態學的兩極中搖擺。審美是形式還是意義,這是一個大大的問號。這個問題或許時至今日還未能解決。Kubler絕對不是要拋棄意義去做一個絕對的形式主義者。康德審美理論中沒有目的的目的性...
評分方聞的《心印》(Images of Mind)、徐小虎(Joan Stanley-Baker)的《被遺忘的真跡》以及巫鴻的《中國古代藝術與建築中的“紀念碑性”》幾本書都有一個鮮為人知的共通點——影響程度雖有所不同,但他們都先後引用到瞭George Kubler的這本The Shape of Time。在1963年齣版伊始...
圖書標籤: arthistory archaeology 藝術史 GeorgeKubler 設計 視覺轉嚮 藝術理論 老老實實的圖書館
在該書問世的時候,曆史作用很大;逆轉瞭美國藝術史中那種重概念的形式分析方式,轉而看到物的有用性。
評分306 KUB
評分在該書問世的時候,曆史作用很大;逆轉瞭美國藝術史中那種重概念的形式分析方式,轉而看到物的有用性。
評分A theory book of scientific elegance. Kubler would perhaps have been very interested in Wind's 1925 paper on kunstlerische Probleme, and his thinking on temporality is at times closer to Riegl, while more acute and layered than Warburg.
評分A theory book of scientific elegance. Kubler would perhaps have been very interested in Wind's 1925 paper on kunstlerische Probleme, and his thinking on temporality is at times closer to Riegl, while more acute and layered than Warburg.
The Shape of Time 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載