The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

Peter Carruthers is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Maryland. He has published widely across different areas of philosophy of mind and cognitive science. His books include The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought (Oxford University Press, 2006), Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2000), and seven co-edited collections of original interdisciplinary essays.

The Animals Issue 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-27

The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 The Animals Issue 电子书的读者还喜欢

The Animals Issue 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Carruthers, Peter

出品人:

页数:224

译者:

出版时间:1992-9-25

价格:USD 45.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780521430920

丛书系列:

图书标签: 心灵哲学哲学原著动物研究动物伦理伦理学

The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

Do animals have moral rights? In contrast to the philosophical gurus of the animal rights movement, whose opinion has held moral sway in recent years, Peter Carruthers here claims that they do not. He explores a variety of moral theories, arguing that animals lack direct moral significance. This provocative but judiciously argued book will appeal to all those interested in animal rights, whatever their initial standpoint. It will also serve as a lively introduction to ethics, demonstrating why theoretical issues in ethics actually matter.

The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

The Animals Issue 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Carruthers有关动物伦理的立场基于他有关动物是否具有现象意识（phenomenal consciousness）这一问题的观点：在他看来，现象意识要求所谓高阶思维（HOT），即以理性为对象的理性，是人所独有的。作者认为，这一点并不给动物伦理带来难题，因为现象意识即便在人类这里所能造成的因果影响也是极为有限的，人类实际上在大多数活动中都与其它动物共享同一套心理机制。但是，这种将意识的现象方面（感质）完全归因于反思能力的做法，从动机上是难以理解的：似乎作者为了达到这一目的，煞费苦心地缩小它的外延，以至于它在功能层面的影响几近于无；既然如此，特意为人类保留这一块虚无缥缈的领域又是为何？作者论证的最大问题在于大量地提出师出无名的特设性假说，这显示出他对理论的含义并不理解，而是汲汲于拯救现象。

评分☆☆☆☆☆