Carl Schmitt, the Thomas Hobbes of the 20th century, joined the Nazi party in 1933 and aspired to become the crown jurist and political philosopher of the Third Reich. But, because of his anti-Nazi past, friendships with Jews and Marxists, and contempt for biological racism, Schmitt was severely attacked by the SS in 1936 and warned to stop posing as a National Socialist thinker. Fearful of what this might imply in the rapidly evolving one-party SS state, Schmitt began to distance himself from his National Socialist adventure--even tempered his recently acquired anti-Semitism--and carefully started to reconnect himself in 1937 and 1938 to the pre-1933 Schmitt. Writing in 1938 under the pretext of studying the significance of the symbol of the leviathan in Hobbes's theory of state, Schmitt alluded to the demise of the Third Reich because of its rapid transformation into a totalitarian polity. As Schmitt recognized, in this state, the Hobbesian protection-obedience axiom was being heavily tilted in favor of obedience at the expense of protection. When this occurred, Schmitt observed, "the soul of a people...betakes itself on the 'secret road' that leads inward. Then grows the counterforce of silence and stillness", and "Public power and force may be ever so completely and emphatically recognized and ever so loyally respected, but only as a public and only an external power, it is hollow and already dead from within." Schmitt survived the fall of the Third Reich, and in the postwar years came to be recognized as one of the most significant political philosophers of the century. This is the first translation available of this important work which will be of great value to scholars and students of modern political philosophy, legal theory, and the history of Weimar and Nazi Germany.
發表於2024-06-24
The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
【讀書筆記】一個潛藏在陰影中的耶穌基督 ——讀施米特《霍布斯國傢學說中的利維坦》 華中師範大學 陳芝 ...
評分施米特的《霍布斯國傢學說中的利維坦》(1938)幾乎與霍布斯的《利維坦》一樣晦澀。施米特花費大量筆墨探討利維坦的詮釋問題卻一無所獲,倒是《完成瞭的宗教改革》(1965)一文的末尾提到索爾斯伯裏的國傢圖像象徵給齣瞭更確切的關於利維坦之形象來源的暗示。此外,《霍》書中...
評分施米特的《霍布斯國傢學說中的利維坦》(1938)幾乎與霍布斯的《利維坦》一樣晦澀。施米特花費大量筆墨探討利維坦的詮釋問題卻一無所獲,倒是《完成瞭的宗教改革》(1965)一文的末尾提到索爾斯伯裏的國傢圖像象徵給齣瞭更確切的關於利維坦之形象來源的暗示。此外,《霍》書中...
評分我們其實在一個圈裏麵生活,那就是自己的小圈,想突破這個小圈很難,我希望能給大傢這樣一個平颱,大傢一起走齣自己的小圈!用大傢的思維,建樹自己的思維! 歡迎加入我們這個小組或小站...............................................
評分讀罷《霍布斯國傢學說中的利維坦》,感覺就象是讀完瞭一部懸疑小說,施米特為大傢解密瞭利維坦這個龐大無比的國傢機器是如何死於猶太學者的陰謀。首先,利維坦在猶太人的神秘神話中,和比希莫斯一樣是異教徒生命力繁衍不息的象徵,利維坦和比希莫斯的爭鬥象徵著異教徒之間的戰...
圖書標籤: 霍布斯 政治 哲學 卡爾施密特
哈哈,這是我從頭到尾一字不落地閱讀完的第一本英文書,有紀念意義。雖然作為演講集子,稍微淺瞭點,但施米特的洞察力可謂是預知瞭許多戰後被熱烈討論的論題,諸如霍布斯與自由主義的關聯、Justice as impariality、政治自由主義as well as public reason等等,真是令人欽佩的頭腦呀。除瞭論題之外,這部書的研究方法也讓人們看到瞭日後的劍橋學派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲學,恐怕隻能獲取一些參考價值。
評分哈哈,這是我從頭到尾一字不落地閱讀完的第一本英文書,有紀念意義。雖然作為演講集子,稍微淺瞭點,但施米特的洞察力可謂是預知瞭許多戰後被熱烈討論的論題,諸如霍布斯與自由主義的關聯、Justice as impariality、政治自由主義as well as public reason等等,真是令人欽佩的頭腦呀。除瞭論題之外,這部書的研究方法也讓人們看到瞭日後的劍橋學派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲學,恐怕隻能獲取一些參考價值。
評分哈哈,這是我從頭到尾一字不落地閱讀完的第一本英文書,有紀念意義。雖然作為演講集子,稍微淺瞭點,但施米特的洞察力可謂是預知瞭許多戰後被熱烈討論的論題,諸如霍布斯與自由主義的關聯、Justice as impariality、政治自由主義as well as public reason等等,真是令人欽佩的頭腦呀。除瞭論題之外,這部書的研究方法也讓人們看到瞭日後的劍橋學派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲學,恐怕隻能獲取一些參考價值。
評分哈哈,這是我從頭到尾一字不落地閱讀完的第一本英文書,有紀念意義。雖然作為演講集子,稍微淺瞭點,但施米特的洞察力可謂是預知瞭許多戰後被熱烈討論的論題,諸如霍布斯與自由主義的關聯、Justice as impariality、政治自由主義as well as public reason等等,真是令人欽佩的頭腦呀。除瞭論題之外,這部書的研究方法也讓人們看到瞭日後的劍橋學派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲學,恐怕隻能獲取一些參考價值。
評分哈哈,這是我從頭到尾一字不落地閱讀完的第一本英文書,有紀念意義。雖然作為演講集子,稍微淺瞭點,但施米特的洞察力可謂是預知瞭許多戰後被熱烈討論的論題,諸如霍布斯與自由主義的關聯、Justice as impariality、政治自由主義as well as public reason等等,真是令人欽佩的頭腦呀。除瞭論題之外,這部書的研究方法也讓人們看到瞭日後的劍橋學派,更像是一部政治思想史研究.因此若是要研究施米特本人的政治哲學,恐怕隻能獲取一些參考價值。
The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載