R.D. Laing, one of the best-known psychiatrists of modern times, was born in Glasgow in 1927 and graduated from Glasgow University as a doctor of medicine. In the 1960's he developed the argument that there may be a benefit in allowing acute mental and emotional turmoil in depth to go on and have its way, and that the outcome of such turmoil could have a positive value. He was the first to put such a stand to the test by establishing, with others, residences where persons could live and be free to let happen what will when the acute psychosis is given free rein, or where, at the very least, they receive no treatment they do not want. This work with the Philadelphia Association since 1964, together with his focus on disturbed and disturbing types of interaction in institutions, groups and families, has been both influential and continually controversial. R.D. Laing's writings range from books on social theory to verse, as well as numerous articles and reviews in scientific journals and the popular press. His publications are: The Divided Self, Self and Others, Interpersonal Perception (with H. Phillipson and A. Robin Lee), Reason and Violence (introduced by Jean-Paul Sartre), Sanity, Madness and the Family (with A. Esterson), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Knots, The Politics of the Family, The Facts of Life, Do You Love Me?, Conversations with Children, Sonnets, The Voice of Experience and Wisdom, Madness and Folly. R.D. Laing died in 1989. Anthony Clare, writing in the Guardian, said of him: "His major achievement was that he dragged the isolated and neglected inner world of the severely psychotic individual out of the back ward of the large gloomy mental hospital and on to the front pages of influential newspapers, journals and literary magazines... Everyone in contemporary psychiatry owes something to R.D. Laing."
Presenting case studies of schizophrenic patients, Laing aims to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. He also offe rs an existential analysis of personal alienation. Dr. Laing's first purpose is to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. In this, with case studies of schizophrenic patients, he succeeds brilliantly, but he does more: through a vision of sanity and madness as 'degrees of conjunction and disjunction between two persons where the one is sane by common consent' he offers a rich existential analysis of personal alienation.
The outsider, estranged from himself and society, cannot experience either himself or others as 'real'. He invents a false self and with it he confronts both the outside world and his own despair. The disintegration of his real self keeps pace with the growing unreality of his false self until, in the extremes of schizophrenic breakdown, the whole personality disintegrates.
發表於2025-01-06
The Divided Self 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
我有一個我,活在黑暗中 不如稱之為它吧,它本屬於我 卻被人驅趕,入瞭黑暗中 它在那裏,閃著光,照亮我的心 我在這裏,躲著人們的目光,保護它 我常常稱它為它,但卻更願意它稱我為它 也許,它纔是我 而我,卻是不屬於我的它 你說的沒錯,我纔是主人 被世人驅逐的,你的主人 ...
評分對我擾動很大的一本書,先簡單寫幾句吧。 第一次讀的時候阻抗很大,激起瞭擔心自己過於努力地去理解嚴重精神病患者有可能讓自己變得精神分裂的恐懼。這種阻抗使我對書中的分析隻能以從外麵嚮內看的方式進行理論上的理解。這種恐懼進入我的夢,然後慢慢地被修通。這種修通本身...
評分記得數年前,我答精神健康課程的老師問,學習精神健康課程的目的。我說,我想知道精神病人到底是不是正常的,和正常人有什麼區彆。多年過去,一直在這個簡單的問題前繞圈子。直至最近老師的一個主體性打開明亮的路途,進一步在本書中找到瞭細緻的解答。也對於自己、曾經愛過的...
評分分裂這個詞被人厭惡,但我最近卻越來越體驗到分裂所帶來的正麵效應。許多時候我們對於分裂的態度導緻瞭問題的不解,而不是分裂本身。分裂大多帶來瞭無數的對抗,但從頭腦的角度來看,對抗的兩邊卻是一體的,這是一種刺激的結果,與生命原塊有關。在生命原塊那裏,凡是未能...
評分分裂這個詞被人厭惡,但我最近卻越來越體驗到分裂所帶來的正麵效應。許多時候我們對於分裂的態度導緻瞭問題的不解,而不是分裂本身。分裂大多帶來瞭無數的對抗,但從頭腦的角度來看,對抗的兩邊卻是一體的,這是一種刺激的結果,與生命原塊有關。在生命原塊那裏,凡是未能...
圖書標籤: R.D.Laing psychopathology
常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
The Divided Self 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載