Presenting case studies of schizophrenic patients, Laing aims to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. He also offe rs an existential analysis of personal alienation. Dr. Laing's first purpose is to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. In this, with case studies of schizophrenic patients, he succeeds brilliantly, but he does more: through a vision of sanity and madness as 'degrees of conjunction and disjunction between two persons where the one is sane by common consent' he offers a rich existential analysis of personal alienation.
The outsider, estranged from himself and society, cannot experience either himself or others as 'real'. He invents a false self and with it he confronts both the outside world and his own despair. The disintegration of his real self keeps pace with the growing unreality of his false self until, in the extremes of schizophrenic breakdown, the whole personality disintegrates.
R.D. Laing, one of the best-known psychiatrists of modern times, was born in Glasgow in 1927 and graduated from Glasgow University as a doctor of medicine. In the 1960's he developed the argument that there may be a benefit in allowing acute mental and emotional turmoil in depth to go on and have its way, and that the outcome of such turmoil could have a positive value. He was the first to put such a stand to the test by establishing, with others, residences where persons could live and be free to let happen what will when the acute psychosis is given free rein, or where, at the very least, they receive no treatment they do not want. This work with the Philadelphia Association since 1964, together with his focus on disturbed and disturbing types of interaction in institutions, groups and families, has been both influential and continually controversial. R.D. Laing's writings range from books on social theory to verse, as well as numerous articles and reviews in scientific journals and the popular press. His publications are: The Divided Self, Self and Others, Interpersonal Perception (with H. Phillipson and A. Robin Lee), Reason and Violence (introduced by Jean-Paul Sartre), Sanity, Madness and the Family (with A. Esterson), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Knots, The Politics of the Family, The Facts of Life, Do You Love Me?, Conversations with Children, Sonnets, The Voice of Experience and Wisdom, Madness and Folly. R.D. Laing died in 1989. Anthony Clare, writing in the Guardian, said of him: "His major achievement was that he dragged the isolated and neglected inner world of the severely psychotic individual out of the back ward of the large gloomy mental hospital and on to the front pages of influential newspapers, journals and literary magazines... Everyone in contemporary psychiatry owes something to R.D. Laing."
我有一個我,活在黑暗中 不如稱之為它吧,它本屬於我 卻被人驅趕,入瞭黑暗中 它在那裏,閃著光,照亮我的心 我在這裏,躲著人們的目光,保護它 我常常稱它為它,但卻更願意它稱我為它 也許,它纔是我 而我,卻是不屬於我的它 你說的沒錯,我纔是主人 被世人驅逐的,你的主人 ...
評分這是一本對我影響很深的書,作者的纔華與慈悲永遠銘記在我的心裏。 這本書是四年前我在網上看到的電子版,那時候我醉心於心理學,我覺的作者對人內在發現的成就的學術成就不亞於弗洛伊德。而人格成就更高。
評分 評分這是一本對我影響很深的書,作者的纔華與慈悲永遠銘記在我的心裏。 這本書是四年前我在網上看到的電子版,那時候我醉心於心理學,我覺的作者對人內在發現的成就的學術成就不亞於弗洛伊德。而人格成就更高。
評分我不知道有多痛可以造就如此的愛,我不知道有多纍可以放射如此的激情。因為我始終依賴我的感官,逃離不齣我的大腦皮層。試著閉上雙眼,我給你的愛並不在這世間萬物之中,敞開你那透明的心,用心來感觸這炙熱的愛,不要害怕,撕裂我的心,那裏有你美麗的住所。
常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有