R.D. Laing, one of the best-known psychiatrists of modern times, was born in Glasgow in 1927 and graduated from Glasgow University as a doctor of medicine. In the 1960's he developed the argument that there may be a benefit in allowing acute mental and emotional turmoil in depth to go on and have its way, and that the outcome of such turmoil could have a positive value. He was the first to put such a stand to the test by establishing, with others, residences where persons could live and be free to let happen what will when the acute psychosis is given free rein, or where, at the very least, they receive no treatment they do not want. This work with the Philadelphia Association since 1964, together with his focus on disturbed and disturbing types of interaction in institutions, groups and families, has been both influential and continually controversial. R.D. Laing's writings range from books on social theory to verse, as well as numerous articles and reviews in scientific journals and the popular press. His publications are: The Divided Self, Self and Others, Interpersonal Perception (with H. Phillipson and A. Robin Lee), Reason and Violence (introduced by Jean-Paul Sartre), Sanity, Madness and the Family (with A. Esterson), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Knots, The Politics of the Family, The Facts of Life, Do You Love Me?, Conversations with Children, Sonnets, The Voice of Experience and Wisdom, Madness and Folly. R.D. Laing died in 1989. Anthony Clare, writing in the Guardian, said of him: "His major achievement was that he dragged the isolated and neglected inner world of the severely psychotic individual out of the back ward of the large gloomy mental hospital and on to the front pages of influential newspapers, journals and literary magazines... Everyone in contemporary psychiatry owes something to R.D. Laing."
Presenting case studies of schizophrenic patients, Laing aims to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. He also offe rs an existential analysis of personal alienation. Dr. Laing's first purpose is to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. In this, with case studies of schizophrenic patients, he succeeds brilliantly, but he does more: through a vision of sanity and madness as 'degrees of conjunction and disjunction between two persons where the one is sane by common consent' he offers a rich existential analysis of personal alienation.
The outsider, estranged from himself and society, cannot experience either himself or others as 'real'. He invents a false self and with it he confronts both the outside world and his own despair. The disintegration of his real self keeps pace with the growing unreality of his false self until, in the extremes of schizophrenic breakdown, the whole personality disintegrates.
發表於2025-02-06
The Divided Self 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
小C是個直男,但是我遇到他的時候,他正將自己有意無意的往gay的形象塑造。他父親常年在外麵跑運輸,聚少離多,母親一個人開店很忙,很少時間顧他。他自小不好不壞,丟到人群中便找不到。等到他20歲,存在感稀薄到臨界點,他就開始給自己貼gay的標簽,我們說他是gay,他有時否...
評分記得數年前,我答精神健康課程的老師問,學習精神健康課程的目的。我說,我想知道精神病人到底是不是正常的,和正常人有什麼區彆。多年過去,一直在這個簡單的問題前繞圈子。直至最近老師的一個主體性打開明亮的路途,進一步在本書中找到瞭細緻的解答。也對於自己、曾經愛過的...
評分 評分 評分在對存在性不安個體焦慮模式進行描述和闡釋之前,可以先從文學的角度來體會其中的一些精神特質。建議去讀卡夫卡的作品,卡夫卡作品中描述的人的狀態近乎就是存在性不安的鮮明例證。 萊因寫到:“如果比較莎士比亞和卡夫卡對人之痛苦及普遍異化的揭露(而不考慮他們各自的天纔)...
圖書標籤: R.D.Laing psychopathology
常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
評分常人:(self/body)⇆other;病人:self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼?閤理麼?我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說,也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions?往壞瞭說,用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的,psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
The Divided Self 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載