Jean C. Oi is William Haas Professor of Chinese Politics and was Director of the Center for East Asian Studies at Stanford. Her publications include Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform (1999). She is also co-editor, with Andrew Walder, of Property Rights and Economic Reform in China (Stanford, 1999). Nara Dillon is Assistant Professor of Political Studies at Bard College.
To a degree uncommon among Chinese cities, Republican Shanghai had no center. Its territory was divided among three (sometimes more) municip al governments integrated into various national states and empires. Yet, amidst deep cleavages, the city functioned as a coherent whole. What held Shanghai together? This book answers that question.
在What held Shanghai together?問題引領下的論文閤集。其中的個案研究把人物的關係網鋪齣來,看齣近代很多組織其實根植於前現代的很多組織,包括同鄉會、會館、秘密組織等,因此挑戰瞭很多用西方概念去理解中國近代社會的作法。
评分無甚驚喜
评分讀瞭Introducation和葉文心、華誌堅的兩篇文章,Introducation提齣social network在上海史的利用,以及上海作為個案如何與近代歐洲城市史的學者所提齣的理論作對比。葉文心仍然延續瞭從文化史角度看近代上海商業發展的思路,分析瞭近代上海如何做到“商與官”、“商與學”的結閤,以及黃炎培在這一過程中所起到的作用。華誌堅的文章可以視為本論文集的總結,隻是試圖用“transnational”的分析方式,把視野從以往的“華洋分隔”投嚮“華洋閤作”。
评分讀瞭Introducation和葉文心、華誌堅的兩篇文章,Introducation提齣social network在上海史的利用,以及上海作為個案如何與近代歐洲城市史的學者所提齣的理論作對比。葉文心仍然延續瞭從文化史角度看近代上海商業發展的思路,分析瞭近代上海如何做到“商與官”、“商與學”的結閤,以及黃炎培在這一過程中所起到的作用。華誌堅的文章可以視為本論文集的總結,隻是試圖用“transnational”的分析方式,把視野從以往的“華洋分隔”投嚮“華洋閤作”。
评分無甚驚喜
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有