邁剋爾.托馬塞洛(Michael Tomasello)
美國發展與比較心理學傢。德國馬剋普朗剋進化人類學研究院聯閤院長,德國萊比锡大學心理學係榮譽教授,美國杜剋大學名譽教授。
從20世紀90年代起,多項學術大奬榮譽加身,被公認為當代最權威的發展與比較心理學傢,是世界範圍內少數被多學科領域認可的學術權威之一。他關於社會認知起源的先鋒性研究,開啓瞭發展心理學與靈長類認知研究的獨特視角。
所獲榮譽(部分):
· 2003年入選德國國傢科學院(German National Academy of Sciences)
· 2006年榮獲被譽為心靈哲學諾貝爾奬的法國讓-尼科奬(Jean Nicod Prize)
· 2010年入選匈牙利國傢科學院(Hungarian National Academy of Sciences)
· 2015年榮獲美國心理協會傑齣科學貢獻大奬
· 2017年入選美國藝術與科學院(American Academy of Arts & Sciences)
· 2017年入選美國國傢科學院(National Academy of Sciences)
譯者 蘇彥捷
北京大學心理學係導師、教授,北京大學元培學院副院長。以發展心理學、生物心理學為研究方嚮,參編多本教材,譯著如《發展心理學》、《女性心理學》、《環境心理學》、《生理心理學》、《心理學與人生》。
Tool-making or culture, language or religious belief: ever since Darwin, thinkers have struggled to identify what fundamentally differentiates human beings from other animals. In this much-anticipated book, Michael Tomasello weaves his twenty years of comparative studies of humans and great apes into a compelling argument that cooperative social interaction is the key to our cognitive uniqueness. Once our ancestors learned to put their heads together with others to pursue shared goals, humankind was on an evolutionary path all its own.
Tomasello argues that our prehuman ancestors, like today’s great apes, were social beings who could solve problems by thinking. But they were almost entirely competitive, aiming only at their individual goals. As ecological changes forced them into more cooperative living arrangements, early humans had to coordinate their actions and communicate their thoughts with collaborative partners. Tomasello’s “shared intentionality hypothesis” captures how these more socially complex forms of life led to more conceptually complex forms of thinking. In order to survive, humans had to learn to see the world from multiple social perspectives, to draw socially recursive inferences, and to monitor their own thinking via the normative standards of the group. Even language and culture arose from the preexisting need to work together. What differentiates us most from other great apes, Tomasello proposes, are the new forms of thinking engendered by our new forms of collaborative and communicative interaction.
A Natural History of Human Thinking is the most detailed scientific analysis to date of the connection between human sociality and cognition.
發表於2024-11-23
A Natural History of Human Thinking 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
如有能力,請看英文版。因為這本書的翻譯實在是差到瞭令人發指的地步。 1.核心術語譯法問題 本書最核心的術語,就是“intentionality”。這個詞,稍微懂點心靈哲學的人應該都很麵熟,知道這個詞國內統一譯法就是“意嚮性”。而這本書給翻成瞭“意圖性”。 “親自掛名”的譯者蘇...
評分全書較為學術嚴謹的介紹瞭human thinking(我傾嚮於翻譯成“人類思考”,以區彆與中文版翻譯“人類思維”。一來強調thinking的動態過程;二來中文思維會有諸如觀點、模型、方法論等的介入,但thinking不強調這一點。)的發展。這個發展可以是human thinking的曆史發展,也可以...
評分原著相信很好,不過翻譯實在可以。短短一個序言,就有好幾處不明所以和語法錯誤: “而與之密切相連的人類活動雖然從錶麵上看充滿瞭個體主義色彩,但背後社會關係、文化習俗、規範和製度在其間扮演的角色決定瞭這僅僅是一種可能。” 有國文好的朋友麻煩告訴我這句話到底是什麼...
評分原著相信很好,不過翻譯實在可以。短短一個序言,就有好幾處不明所以和語法錯誤: “而與之密切相連的人類活動雖然從錶麵上看充滿瞭個體主義色彩,但背後社會關係、文化習俗、規範和製度在其間扮演的角色決定瞭這僅僅是一種可能。” 有國文好的朋友麻煩告訴我這句話到底是什麼...
評分如有能力,請看英文版。因為這本書的翻譯實在是差到瞭令人發指的地步。 1.核心術語譯法問題 本書最核心的術語,就是“intentionality”。這個詞,稍微懂點心靈哲學的人應該都很麵熟,知道這個詞國內統一譯法就是“意嚮性”。而這本書給翻成瞭“意圖性”。 “親自掛名”的譯者蘇...
圖書標籤: 認知科學 科普 哲學 Michael_Tomasello 認知 CS 美國 知識論
Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
評分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
評分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
評分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
評分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
A Natural History of Human Thinking 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載