The frontier between 'law' and 'politics' is not always clear-cut. A large area exists where courts operate, but where governments and parliaments also make decisions. Tim Koopmans compares the way American, British, French and German law and politics deal with different issues: in many instances subjects which are highly 'political' in one country constitute legal issues in another. Is there, for example a 'sovereign Parliament' (as there is in Britain), or will courts control the compatibility of statutes with the Constitution (as in the United States and Germany)? How far can courts go in controlling the legality of administrative action? Are there general legal theories about the frontier between what courts and what politics can do? Koopmans considers case law on a range of issues, including human rights protection, federalism, separation of powers, equal protection and the impact of European and international law.
英国、美国、法国、德国法院制度的比较研究。律师写的,比较简洁清晰
评分英国、美国、法国、德国法院制度的比较研究。律师写的,比较简洁清晰
评分英国、美国、法国、德国法院制度的比较研究。律师写的,比较简洁清晰
评分英国、美国、法国、德国法院制度的比较研究。律师写的,比较简洁清晰
评分英国、美国、法国、德国法院制度的比较研究。律师写的,比较简洁清晰
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有