Naturalizing Jurisprudence

出版者:Oxford University Press, USA

作者:Brian Leiter

页数:275

出版时间:2007-5-17

价格:USD 55.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780199206490

图书标签:法理法哲学法理学概念分析

Brian Leiter is widely recognized as the leading philosophical interpreter of the jurisprudence of American Legal Realism, as well as the most influential proponent of the relevance of the naturalistic turn in philosophy to the problems of legal philosophy. This volume collects newly revised versions of ten of his best-known essays, which set out his reinterpretation of the Legal Realists as prescient philosophical naturalists; critically engage with jurisprudential responses to Legal Realism, from legal positivism to Critical Legal Studies; connect the Realist program to the methodology debate in contemporary jurisprudence; and explore the general implications of a naturalistic world view for problems about the objectivity of law and morality. Leiter has supplied a lengthy new introductory essay, as well as postscripts to several of the essays, in which he responds to challenges to his interpretive and philosophical claims by academic lawyers and philosophers. This volume will be essential reading for anyone interested in jurisprudence, as well as for philosophers concerned with the consequences of naturalism in moral and legal philosophy.

用户评价

细读了1246四篇文章。莱特主张重新描述实证主义（更关注事实及裁判可预测性），转向自然化的法理学（接纳社会科学与自然科学，放弃概念分析）。由于是多篇论文集结，主题虽然近似但观点比较分散，难以全面无矛盾地加以整理。

第一部分由于不确定性导致的上诉法院审判理论的自然化，第二部分表层为排他法律实证主义背后法律理论的自然化，第三部分道德与法律的客观性。个人感觉蛮奇怪的。

第一部分由于不确定性导致的上诉法院审判理论的自然化，第二部分表层为排他法律实证主义背后法律理论的自然化，第三部分道德与法律的客观性。个人感觉蛮奇怪的。

细读了1246四篇文章。莱特主张重新描述实证主义（更关注事实及裁判可预测性），转向自然化的法理学（接纳社会科学与自然科学，放弃概念分析）。由于是多篇论文集结，主题虽然近似但观点比较分散，难以全面无矛盾地加以整理。

第一部分由于不确定性导致的上诉法院审判理论的自然化，第二部分表层为排他法律实证主义背后法律理论的自然化，第三部分道德与法律的客观性。个人感觉蛮奇怪的。