In January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws, and held for the first time that women had a constitutional right to safe and legal abortions. Three decades later, Roe v. Wade remains one of the Supreme Court's most controversial decisions, and political struggles over abortion rights still divide American politics. In "What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said", eleven distinguished constitutional scholars rewrite the opinions in this controversial case in light of thirty years' experience by making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Taking positions both for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors offer novel and illuminating arguments that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack M. Balkin gives a detailed introduction to Roe v. Wade, chronicling the history of the Roe litigation, the constitutional and political clashes that followed, and the state of abortion rights in the U.S. today.
具體描述
讀後感
用戶評價
針鋒相對 沒完沒瞭
评分針鋒相對 沒完沒瞭
评分圍觀完高手論戰總會變得更沒立場～在有沒有這樣一種憲法權利和應不應該由法院決定這個問題上都有巨大分歧～感覺anita allen和jed rubenfeld的可讀性比較強，尤其是rubenfeld的判決，太逗瞭～
评分針鋒相對 沒完沒瞭
评分圍觀完高手論戰總會變得更沒立場～在有沒有這樣一種憲法權利和應不應該由法院決定這個問題上都有巨大分歧～感覺anita allen和jed rubenfeld的可讀性比較強，尤其是rubenfeld的判決，太逗瞭～
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有