Madeleine Zelin is Professor of History and East Asian Languages and Cultures at Columbia University.
Jonathan K. Ocko is Professor and Head of the Department of History at North Carolina State University, and an Adjunct Professor of Chinese Legal History at Duke Law School.
Robert Gardella is professor in the Humanities Department at the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
发表于2024-11-22
Contract and Property in Early Modern China 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
浙大出版社这个译丛,实在选书别致,隐然有高手。曾小萍等人编的这本论文集,04年出版,11年译出,就大陆出版业来说也算快手了。 虽然是论文集,这本书的结构很清晰,上半部分讨论土地产权,下半部分讨论商业活动与企业。土地产权部分,曾小萍作了总论性质的论文,后面分别是奥...
评分浙大出版社这个译丛,实在选书别致,隐然有高手。曾小萍等人编的这本论文集,04年出版,11年译出,就大陆出版业来说也算快手了。 虽然是论文集,这本书的结构很清晰,上半部分讨论土地产权,下半部分讨论商业活动与企业。土地产权部分,曾小萍作了总论性质的论文,后面分别是奥...
评分浙大出版社这个译丛,实在选书别致,隐然有高手。曾小萍等人编的这本论文集,04年出版,11年译出,就大陆出版业来说也算快手了。 虽然是论文集,这本书的结构很清晰,上半部分讨论土地产权,下半部分讨论商业活动与企业。土地产权部分,曾小萍作了总论性质的论文,后面分别是奥...
评分浙大出版社这个译丛,实在选书别致,隐然有高手。曾小萍等人编的这本论文集,04年出版,11年译出,就大陆出版业来说也算快手了。 虽然是论文集,这本书的结构很清晰,上半部分讨论土地产权,下半部分讨论商业活动与企业。土地产权部分,曾小萍作了总论性质的论文,后面分别是奥...
评分浙大出版社这个译丛,实在选书别致,隐然有高手。曾小萍等人编的这本论文集,04年出版,11年译出,就大陆出版业来说也算快手了。 虽然是论文集,这本书的结构很清晰,上半部分讨论土地产权,下半部分讨论商业活动与企业。土地产权部分,曾小萍作了总论性质的论文,后面分别是奥...
图书标签: 经济史 海外中国研究 法律史与法律文化 Zelin 讀史 論文 美国汉学 社会史
The role of contract in early modern Chinese economic life, when acknowledged at all, is usually presented as a minor one. This volume demonstrates that contract actually played a critical role in the everyday structure of many kinds of relationships and transactions; contracts are, moreover, of enormous value to present-day scholars as transcriptions of the fine details of day-to-day economic activity.
Offering a new perspective on economic and legal institutions, particularly the closely related institutions of contract and property, in Qing and Republican China, the papers in this volume spell out how these institutions worked in specific social contexts. Drawing on recent research in far-flung archives, the contributors take as givens both the embeddedness of contract in Chinese social and economic discourse and its role in the spread of commodification. Two papers deal with broad issues: Zelin's argues for a distinctively Chinese heritage of strong property rights, and Ocko's examines the usefulness of American legal scholarship as a comparative analytic framework.
细读了第一部分。Cohen对合同在清代运用的讨论及其限制的研究最为扎实,其他几位文章虽有启发意义,但恐怕只为凑文章出本书,诸多史料只是一笔带过,甚至毫无不提及(Zelin对战前存在财产权的讨论,更像只是提个论点而无论据;Buoye做了几个个案分析,但难以支撑其试图在宏观上结构上讨论财产权观念演变与暴力冲突的论点;Allee挑了几个涉及契约的裁判,就凑了个数;欧中坦一文可作法律经济学基础及21世纪以前财产权讨论的文献索引)。
评分I definitely think that we have a better and clearer understanding of the property rights regime in Late Imperial and Early Republic China. But let's see...
评分I definitely think that we have a better and clearer understanding of the property rights regime in Late Imperial and Early Republic China. But let's see...
评分I definitely think that we have a better and clearer understanding of the property rights regime in Late Imperial and Early Republic China. But let's see...
评分I definitely think that we have a better and clearer understanding of the property rights regime in Late Imperial and Early Republic China. But let's see...
Contract and Property in Early Modern China 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书