Andersen-Wyman's book undoes most scholarly uses and understandings of "De amore" by Andreas Capellanus. By offering a reading promoted by the text itself, Andersen-Wyman shows how Andreas undermines the narrative foundations of sacred and secular institutions and renders their power absurd. Her book offers the best explanation yet for why Andreas's was one of only two books condemned by Bishop Tempier in 1276: the tools Andreas offers his readers, as well as what Andreas suggests about his own desire and what should be the place of women in society, could make his book dangerous in almost any era.
切,"double truth"根本就是虛晃一下,完全沒介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虛晃一下,完全沒介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虛晃一下,完全沒介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虛晃一下,完全沒介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虛晃一下,完全沒介入
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有