By showing us the human brain at work, PET (positron emission tomography) scans are subtly - and sometimes not so subtly - transforming how we think about our minds. "Picturing Personhood" follows this remarkable and expensive technology from the laboratory into the world and back. It examines how PET scans are created and how they are being called on to answer myriad questions with far-reaching implications: Is depression an observable brain disease? Are criminals insane? Do men and women think differently? Is rationality a function of the brain? Based on interviews, media analysis, and participant observation at research labs and conferences, Joseph Dumit analyzes how assumptions designed into and read out of the experimental process reinforce specific notions about human nature. Such assumptions can enter the process at any turn, from selecting subjects and mathematical models to deciding which images to publish and how to color them. Once they leave the laboratory, PET scans shape social debates, influence courtroom outcomes, and have positive and negative consequences for people suffering mental illness. Dumit follows this complex story, demonstrating how brain scans, as scientific objects, contribute to our increasing social dependence on scientific authority. The first book to examine the cultural ramifications of brain-imaging technology, "Picturing Personhood" is an unprecedented study that will influence both cultural studies and the growing field of science and technology studies.
發表於2024-11-25
Picturing Personhood 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: posthumanism biocapital
NSF建議引用,所以迴頭看瞭些對科學領域的曆史/人類學研究。不做這些瞭纔強烈感受到福柯式或者其他套路化的問題與迴答的泛濫。幾乎不見真實的科學深度。#我知道研究科學圖像曾經火,但連圖像怎麼生成的,背後的假設、模型和實驗設計都不談就來跟我講圖像的意義和解讀??
評分NSF建議引用,所以迴頭看瞭些對科學領域的曆史/人類學研究。不做這些瞭纔強烈感受到福柯式或者其他套路化的問題與迴答的泛濫。幾乎不見真實的科學深度。#我知道研究科學圖像曾經火,但連圖像怎麼生成的,背後的假設、模型和實驗設計都不談就來跟我講圖像的意義和解讀??
評分NSF建議引用,所以迴頭看瞭些對科學領域的曆史/人類學研究。不做這些瞭纔強烈感受到福柯式或者其他套路化的問題與迴答的泛濫。幾乎不見真實的科學深度。#我知道研究科學圖像曾經火,但連圖像怎麼生成的,背後的假設、模型和實驗設計都不談就來跟我講圖像的意義和解讀??
評分NSF建議引用,所以迴頭看瞭些對科學領域的曆史/人類學研究。不做這些瞭纔強烈感受到福柯式或者其他套路化的問題與迴答的泛濫。幾乎不見真實的科學深度。#我知道研究科學圖像曾經火,但連圖像怎麼生成的,背後的假設、模型和實驗設計都不談就來跟我講圖像的意義和解讀??
評分NSF建議引用,所以迴頭看瞭些對科學領域的曆史/人類學研究。不做這些瞭纔強烈感受到福柯式或者其他套路化的問題與迴答的泛濫。幾乎不見真實的科學深度。#我知道研究科學圖像曾經火,但連圖像怎麼生成的,背後的假設、模型和實驗設計都不談就來跟我講圖像的意義和解讀??
Picturing Personhood 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載