Starting in the early 1990s, artists such as Quentin Tarantino, David Foster Wallace, and Kurt Cobain contributed to a swelling cultural tide of pop postmodernism that swept through music, film, literature, and fashion. In cinema in particular, some of the art's most fundamental aspects--stories, characters, and genres, for instance--assumed such a trite and trivialized appearance that only rarely could they take their places on the screen without provoking an inward smirk or a wink from the audience. In horror films, characters knew what was coming next from having already studied the horror genre themselves; in Westerns, new plots developed out of an assortment of old ones; and in action features, few heroes came without a strong hint of the anti-hero as well. Out of this highly self-conscious and world-weary environment, however, a new group of filmmakers began to develop as the decade wore on, with a new set of styles and sensibilities to match. In Post-Pop Cinema author Jesse Fox Mayshark takes us on a film-by-film tour of the works of Wes and P. T. Anderson, Sofia Coppola, Richard Linklater, Alexander Payne, and David O. Russell, and reveals how a common pool of styles, collaborators, and personal connections helps them to confront the unifying problem of meaning in American film. Wes Anderson's Bottle Rocket (1996) and Paul Thomas Anderson's Boogie Nights (1997) were ultimately about their characters' lives-even though their characters often dealt with highly contrived environments and situations. And soon after Wes Anderson scored his first success, others like David O. Russell (Flirting With Disaster, Three Kings), the screenwriter Charlie Kaufman (who collaborated with SpikeJonze on such projects as Being John Malkovich and Adaptation), Alexander Payne (Election, Sideways), Richard Kelly (Donnie Darko), and Sofia Coppola (Lost in Translation) began to tread their own paths over this same ground. Although these men and women represent a wide range of styles and subject matter, all their films revolve in different ways around the difficulty of establishing and maintaining connections. This theme of connection also runs deeper than the films made: the directors share actors (Mark Wahlberg, Bill Murray, Ben Stiller, Jason Schwartzman), collaborators (the musician Jon Brion) and sometimes even personal connections (Spike Jonze starred in Russell's Three Kings, and was married to Coppola). Together these filmmakers form a loose and distinctly American school of filmmaking, one informed by postmodernism but not in thrall to it, and one that every year becomes more important to the world of cinema both within and beyond the United States. Author Jesse Fox Mayshark has been reviewing these filmmakers from their debut features to the present day This book represents not only the first prolonged study devoted to several of these very important filmmakers, but also the first effort to chronicle the efforts of this group as a whole.
發表於2024-11-29
Post-pop Cinema 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 電影 評論·批評 美國
"Introduction" is brilliant。作者並不隻是做電影評論,也是評論電影映射齣的時代。我們(和比我們大十歲左右)這一代的集體經驗集體睏惑集體迷惘集體探索在這些導演的作品中都有所體現,甚至是它們的主要subjects。 對於作品和導演的看法和我自己的很接近(比如褒揚的和覺得不夠齣色的)。
評分"Introduction" is brilliant。作者並不隻是做電影評論,也是評論電影映射齣的時代。我們(和比我們大十歲左右)這一代的集體經驗集體睏惑集體迷惘集體探索在這些導演的作品中都有所體現,甚至是它們的主要subjects。 對於作品和導演的看法和我自己的很接近(比如褒揚的和覺得不夠齣色的)。
評分"Introduction" is brilliant。作者並不隻是做電影評論,也是評論電影映射齣的時代。我們(和比我們大十歲左右)這一代的集體經驗集體睏惑集體迷惘集體探索在這些導演的作品中都有所體現,甚至是它們的主要subjects。 對於作品和導演的看法和我自己的很接近(比如褒揚的和覺得不夠齣色的)。
評分"Introduction" is brilliant。作者並不隻是做電影評論,也是評論電影映射齣的時代。我們(和比我們大十歲左右)這一代的集體經驗集體睏惑集體迷惘集體探索在這些導演的作品中都有所體現,甚至是它們的主要subjects。 對於作品和導演的看法和我自己的很接近(比如褒揚的和覺得不夠齣色的)。
評分"Introduction" is brilliant。作者並不隻是做電影評論,也是評論電影映射齣的時代。我們(和比我們大十歲左右)這一代的集體經驗集體睏惑集體迷惘集體探索在這些導演的作品中都有所體現,甚至是它們的主要subjects。 對於作品和導演的看法和我自己的很接近(比如褒揚的和覺得不夠齣色的)。
Post-pop Cinema 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載