Two-thirds of Americans polled by the "Associated Press" agree with the following statement: "An animal's right to live free of suffering should be just as important as a person's right to live free of suffering." More than 50 percent of Americans believe that it is wrong to kill animals to make fur coats or to hunt them for sport. But these same Americans eat hamburgers, take their children to circuses and rodeos, and use products developed with animal testing. How do we justify our inconsistency? In this easy-to-read introduction, animal rights advocate Gary Francione looks at our conventional moral thinking about animals. Using examples, analogies, and thought-experiments, he reveals the dramatic inconsistency between what we say we believe about animals and how we actually treat them. "Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?" provides a guidebook to examining our social and personal ethical beliefs. It takes us through concepts of property and equal consideration to arrive at the basic contention of animal rights: that everyone - human and non-human - has the right not to be treated as a means to an end. Along the way, it illuminates concepts and theories that all of us use but few of us understand - the nature of "rights" and "interests," for example, and the theories of Locke, Descartes, and Bentham. Filled with fascinating information and cogent arguments, this is a book that you may love or hate, but that will never fail to inform, enlighten, and educate. Author note: Gary L. Francione is Professor of Law and Nicholas de B. Katzenbach Scholar of Law and Philosophy at Rutgers University Law School, Newark. He is the author of "Animals, Property, and the Law" and "Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement" (both Temple).
發表於2025-01-01
Introduction to Animal Rights 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
植物也是生命,那如果食用動物是不應該的,那對於植物也同樣。所以素食主義者都是虛僞的。 a.動物權利主義者主張我們不應該食用動物屍體並非是因為動物是生命(所以我們也不應該食用植物和我們是虛僞的結論也便是荒謬的)。 b.很明顯殺一個人和殺十個人在道德上是有很大區彆的...
評分對於動物權利,國人大多缺乏瞭解。原因很簡單,人權為中國社會所普遍接受也不過是最近幾年的事,因此在動物權利的問題上,我們大傢都需要一個學習和思考的過程。因此,莽萍老師主編的護生文叢的齣版真算得上及時雨。 在為動物權利辯護的各傢之中,國人最熟悉的不外...
評分植物也是生命,那如果食用動物是不應該的,那對於植物也同樣。所以素食主義者都是虛僞的。 a.動物權利主義者主張我們不應該食用動物屍體並非是因為動物是生命(所以我們也不應該食用植物和我們是虛僞的結論也便是荒謬的)。 b.很明顯殺一個人和殺十個人在道德上是有很大區彆的...
評分對於動物權利,國人大多缺乏瞭解。原因很簡單,人權為中國社會所普遍接受也不過是最近幾年的事,因此在動物權利的問題上,我們大傢都需要一個學習和思考的過程。因此,莽萍老師主編的護生文叢的齣版真算得上及時雨。 在為動物權利辯護的各傢之中,國人最熟悉的不外...
評分對於動物權利,國人大多缺乏瞭解。原因很簡單,人權為中國社會所普遍接受也不過是最近幾年的事,因此在動物權利的問題上,我們大傢都需要一個學習和思考的過程。因此,莽萍老師主編的護生文叢的齣版真算得上及時雨。 在為動物權利辯護的各傢之中,國人最熟悉的不外...
圖書標籤: 倫理學
Introduction to Animal Rights 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載