David S. Nivision first joined the faculty at Stanford University in 1948, and retired from there in 1988. He began by working on the late Qing philosopher Zhang Xuecheng; Nivision's Life and Thought (1966) of that early modern Chinese thinker was highly acclaimed. Nivision's studies then led him to move back through Chinese history, and he eventually came to make important discoveries about early Chinese chronology and astronomy. (Syndetics)
"Confucianism is one of the world's most influential philosophical traditions, offering profound and challenging insights on human nature, virtue, ethical cultivation, and the foundations of civilization. In The Ways of Confucianism, David S. Nivison brings out the exciting variety within Confucian thought, as he interprets and elucidates key thinkers from over two thousand years, from Confucius himself, through Mencius and Xunzi, to such later Confucians as Wang Yangming, Dai Zhen, and Zhang Xuecheng." "Professor Nivison, who retired from Stanford University in 1988, brings to bear a rare combination of skills in both sinology and Western philosophy. He wields the methodological tools of a classical philology and Anglo-American philosophy to weave a fascinating account of how Confucians have grappled with momentous human issues, how they have responded to their intellectual rivals, and how their thinking has evolved through the centuries."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved (Blackwell)
Is human nature good or evil? Does knowledge guarantee right action, or can humans do what is wrong when they know what is right? What parts should teachers, classic texts, and our own moral intuitions play in our ethical cultivation?
Confucianism is one of the world's most influential philosophical traditions, offering profound and challenging insights on human nature, virtue, and the foundations of civilization. In The Ways of Confucianism, David S. Nivison brings out the exciting variety within Confucian thought, as he interprets and elucidates key thinkers from over two thousand years, from Confucius himself, through Mencius and Xunzi, to Wang Yangming, Dai Zhen, and Zhang Xuecheng.
Confucianism is one of the most influential philosophical traditions in the world, with profound and challenging insights on human nature, virtue, ethical cultivation, and the foundations of morality and civilization. In this collection of essays, most never before published, Nivison presents nuanced and subtle interpretations of key thinkers from over two thousand years in the Confucian movement. Copyright ?Libri GmbH. All rights reserved
發表於2024-11-18
The Ways of Confucianism 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
對這本書最早關注的就是意誌無力的問題,道德如果是好的,為何我們卻不能要求自身按照道德行事,而是受到外物的乾擾呢?作者在論述德的時候分瞭三個部分首先就是從甲骨占蔔中考察原始含義。大緻可以理解為德就是在祭祀或者占蔔的時候要求有所犧牲的東西,而這種東西犧牲之後卻...
評分米蘭昆德拉曾批評笛卡爾的“我思故我在”,認為其忽略瞭肉體的真實感,在他看來,牙疼比我思更真實,他的命題應該是“我欲故我在”吧。 儒傢哲學,也有類似於“我思故我在”的命題,更準確點,應該是“我德故我在。”如孟子認為不忠不孝的人就是禽獸,這個命題就是“我德故我在...
評分米蘭昆德拉曾批評笛卡爾的“我思故我在”,認為其忽略瞭肉體的真實感,在他看來,牙疼比我思更真實,他的命題應該是“我欲故我在”吧。 儒傢哲學,也有類似於“我思故我在”的命題,更準確點,應該是“我德故我在。”如孟子認為不忠不孝的人就是禽獸,這個命題就是“我德故我在...
評分米蘭昆德拉曾批評笛卡爾的“我思故我在”,認為其忽略瞭肉體的真實感,在他看來,牙疼比我思更真實,他的命題應該是“我欲故我在”吧。 儒傢哲學,也有類似於“我思故我在”的命題,更準確點,應該是“我德故我在。”如孟子認為不忠不孝的人就是禽獸,這個命題就是“我德故我在...
評分米蘭昆德拉曾批評笛卡爾的“我思故我在”,認為其忽略瞭肉體的真實感,在他看來,牙疼比我思更真實,他的命題應該是“我欲故我在”吧。 儒傢哲學,也有類似於“我思故我在”的命題,更準確點,應該是“我德故我在。”如孟子認為不忠不孝的人就是禽獸,這個命題就是“我德故我在...
圖書標籤: 知識分子 方法論 儒傢 倪文孫 人類學
The Ways of Confucianism 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載