Creations of the Mind presents sixteen original essays by theorists from a wide variety of disciplines who have a shared interest in the nature of artifacts and their implications for the human mind. All the papers are written specially for this volume, and they cover a broad range of topics concerned with the metaphysics of artifacts, our concepts of artifacts and the categories that they represent, the emergence of an understanding of artifacts in infants' cognitive development, as well as the evolution of artifacts and the use of tools by non-human animals. This volume will be a fascinating resource for philosophers, cognitive scientists, and psychologists, and the starting point for future research in the study of artifacts and their role in human understanding, development, and behaviour. Contributors: John R. Searle, Richard E. Grandy, Crawford L. Elder, Amie L. Thomasson, Jerrold Levinson, Barbara C. Malt, Steven A. Sloman, Dan Sperber, Hilary Kornblith, Paul Bloom, Bradford Z. Mahon, Alfonso Caramazza, Jean M. Mandler, Deborah Kelemen, Susan Carey, Frank C. Keil, Marissa L. Greif, Rebekkah S. Kerner, James L. Gould, Marc D. Hauser, Laurie R. Santos, Steven Mithen
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
Searle的开篇不是很相干，Grandy是mereology的套路，Elder这篇最有趣，观点难得一见（an realist essentialist defense of artifacts）但defense不靠谱，Thomasson这篇是老生常谈（artifacts are ideal objects)，Levinson这篇是其实更像是一个lexicon entry。后面Mind&Language和developmental psych的部分不打算看了
评分Searle的开篇不是很相干，Grandy是mereology的套路，Elder这篇最有趣，观点难得一见（an realist essentialist defense of artifacts）但defense不靠谱，Thomasson这篇是老生常谈（artifacts are ideal objects)，Levinson这篇是其实更像是一个lexicon entry。后面Mind&Language和developmental psych的部分不打算看了
评分Searle的开篇不是很相干，Grandy是mereology的套路，Elder这篇最有趣，观点难得一见（an realist essentialist defense of artifacts）但defense不靠谱，Thomasson这篇是老生常谈（artifacts are ideal objects)，Levinson这篇是其实更像是一个lexicon entry。后面Mind&Language和developmental psych的部分不打算看了
评分Searle的开篇不是很相干，Grandy是mereology的套路，Elder这篇最有趣，观点难得一见（an realist essentialist defense of artifacts）但defense不靠谱，Thomasson这篇是老生常谈（artifacts are ideal objects)，Levinson这篇是其实更像是一个lexicon entry。后面Mind&Language和developmental psych的部分不打算看了
评分Searle的开篇不是很相干，Grandy是mereology的套路，Elder这篇最有趣，观点难得一见（an realist essentialist defense of artifacts）但defense不靠谱，Thomasson这篇是老生常谈（artifacts are ideal objects)，Levinson这篇是其实更像是一个lexicon entry。后面Mind&Language和developmental psych的部分不打算看了
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有