The New Spirit of Capitalism pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Luc Boltanski teaches sociology at the EHESS, Paris. He is the author of numerous books, including The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society.

Eve Chiapello is an associate professor at the HEC School of Management, Paris. She is the author of Artistes versus Managers.

出版者:Verso

作者:Luc Boltanski

出品人:

頁數:601

译者:Gregory Elliott

出版時間:2007-09-17

價格:USD 49.95

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9781844671656

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

Boltanski
社會學
資本主義
社會理論
政治經濟學
政治學
capitalism
Marxism

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到本本書屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

A century after the publication of Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism a major new work examines network-based organization, employee autonomy and post-Fordist horizontal work structures.

Why is the critique of capitalism so ineffective today? In this major work, the sociologists Eve Chiapello and Luc Boltanski suggest that we should be addressing the crisis of anticapitalist critique by exploring its very roots.

This highly acclaimed work examines the structure of capitalism and how it has been reorganized sicne the 1960s. Via an unprecedented examination of management texts the authors find that employers are using the language of 1968 counterculture to drive through new work practices and more successful and subtle forms of exploitation.

They argue that from the middle of the 1970s onwards, capitalism abandoned the hierarchical Fordist work structure and developed a network-based form of organization that was founded on employee initiative and authnomy in the work-place - a “freedom” that came at the cost of material and psychological security. in a work that is already a paradigm-shifting classic, Boltanski and Chiapello show how the new spirit triumphed thanks to a remarkable recuperation of the Left’s critique of the alienation of everyday life.

This book, remarkable for its scope and ambition, seeks to lay the basis for a revival of these two complementary critiques.