Barry R. Posen is Ford International Professor of Political Science and director of the Security Studies Program at MIT. He is the author of The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (winner of the Furniss Award and the Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award), Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Risks, and Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy, all from Cornell.
The United States, Barry R. Posen argues in Restraint, has grown incapable of moderating its ambitions in international politics. Since the collapse of Soviet power, it has pursued a grand strategy that he calls "liberal hegemony," one that Posen sees as unnecessary, counterproductive, costly, and wasteful. Written for policymakers and observers alike, Restraint explains precisely why this grand strategy works poorly and then provides a carefully designed alternative grand strategy and an associated military strategy and force structure. In contrast to the failures and unexpected problems that have stemmed from America's consistent overreaching, Posen makes an urgent argument for restraint in the future use of U.S. military strength.
After setting out the political implications of restraint as a guiding principle, Posen sketches the appropriate military forces and posture that would support such a strategy. He works with a deliberately constrained notion of grand strategy and, even more important, of national security (which he defines as including sovereignty, territorial integrity, power position, and safety). His alternative for military strategy, which Posen calls "command of the commons," focuses on protecting U.S. global access through naval, air, and space power, while freeing the United States from most of the relationships that require the permanent stationing of U.S. forces overseas.
發表於2024-12-27
Restraint 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 國際關係 戰略 政治學 安全研究 美國外交政策 美國 戰略研究
the case for restraint做得很好;但後麵的force structure planning似乎論證沒那麼嚴密。不談軍事技術和作戰學說的發展革新,一方麵談中國能力趨勢,另一方麵在規劃時卻以海灣戰爭或伊拉剋自由行動為參考案例,顯得有點暗自不擇手段、為裁軍而裁軍的意思。
評分the case for restraint做得很好;但後麵的force structure planning似乎論證沒那麼嚴密。不談軍事技術和作戰學說的發展革新,一方麵談中國能力趨勢,另一方麵在規劃時卻以海灣戰爭或伊拉剋自由行動為參考案例,顯得有點暗自不擇手段、為裁軍而裁軍的意思。
評分the case for restraint做得很好;但後麵的force structure planning似乎論證沒那麼嚴密。不談軍事技術和作戰學說的發展革新,一方麵談中國能力趨勢,另一方麵在規劃時卻以海灣戰爭或伊拉剋自由行動為參考案例,顯得有點暗自不擇手段、為裁軍而裁軍的意思。
評分the case for restraint做得很好;但後麵的force structure planning似乎論證沒那麼嚴密。不談軍事技術和作戰學說的發展革新,一方麵談中國能力趨勢,另一方麵在規劃時卻以海灣戰爭或伊拉剋自由行動為參考案例,顯得有點暗自不擇手段、為裁軍而裁軍的意思。
評分the case for restraint做得很好;但後麵的force structure planning似乎論證沒那麼嚴密。不談軍事技術和作戰學說的發展革新,一方麵談中國能力趨勢,另一方麵在規劃時卻以海灣戰爭或伊拉剋自由行動為參考案例,顯得有點暗自不擇手段、為裁軍而裁軍的意思。
Restraint 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載