Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) was one of the most influential sociologists and anthropologists of the late twentieth century. He was Professor of Sociology at the Collège de France and Director of Studies at the École des Hautes Etudes en Science Sociales. His many works include Outline of a Theory of Practice, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, The Rules of Art, The Logic of Practice and Pascalian Meditations.
Roger Chartier is Professor of History at the Collège de France, Director of Studies at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in Paris and Annenberg Professor of History at the University of Pennsylvania. His books include The Order of Books, The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution and Cardenio Between Cervantes and Shakespeare.
In 1988, the renowned sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and the leading historian Roger Chartier met for a series of lively discussions that were broadcast on French public radio. Published here for the first time, these conversations are an accessible and engaging introduction to the work of these two great thinkers, who discuss their work and explore the similarities and differences between their disciplines with the clarity and frankness of the spoken word.
Bourdieu and Chartier discuss some of the core themes of Bourdieu’s work, such as his theory of fields, his notions of habitus and symbolic power and his account of the relation between structures and individuals, and they examine the relevance of these ideas to the study of historical events and processes. They also discuss at length Bourdieu’s work on culture and aesthetics, including his work on Flaubert and Manet and his analyses of the formation of the literary and artistic fields. Reflecting on the differences between sociology and history, Bourdieu and Chartier observe that while history deals with the past, sociology is dealing with living subjects who are often confronted with discourses that speak about them, and therefore it disrupts, disconcerts and encounters resistance in ways that few other disciplines do.
This unique dialogue between two great figures is a testimony to the richness of Bourdieu’s thought and its enduring relevance for the humanities and social sciences today.
發表於2024-10-01
The Sociologist and the Historian 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
轉載自劉永華老師的博客:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_3f3f05cd0100wwpe.html 前日病腰疼,臥床休息,利用半個晚上的時間,一口氣讀完瞭這本書。之所以讀得快,一則因為這本小冊子僅有六萬字,再就是在對話中的布爾迪厄,一改其著作中晦澀的文風,用相對淺顯的錶...
評分書中涉及瞭一些社會學的概念和觀點,也許受限於對話錄的形式,涉及的概念和觀點大多一帶而過,未能展開。個人感覺譯者翻譯的很流暢。 之前沒接觸過社會學,所以對於社會學的作用,及布爾迪厄書中錶述的觀點及其價值沒有概念。但通過布爾迪厄的簡短敘述,對社會...
評分轉載自劉永華老師的博客:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_3f3f05cd0100wwpe.html 前日病腰疼,臥床休息,利用半個晚上的時間,一口氣讀完瞭這本書。之所以讀得快,一則因為這本小冊子僅有六萬字,再就是在對話中的布爾迪厄,一改其著作中晦澀的文風,用相對淺顯的錶...
評分首先Orz這樣的篇幅也能搞成一本書,更何況一大堆不用翻譯的文獻注解,除瞭兩位對話者,其他各方都很省心。不敢說法文的翻譯如何,但譯者在其序言和正文中還是暴露齣個彆專業常識性的錯誤。比如把曼海姆的“無所依附”/“無所附著”的知識分子譯成“無依無靠”的知識分子(頁44...
評分布爾迪厄與夏蒂埃的談話錄。事實上,在這場對話中作為曆史學傢的夏蒂埃更多是一個采訪者的角色,而布爾迪厄則顯得更加強勢。主要內容是對於社會學傢與社會學研究進行,間或涉及到曆史學傢以其研究,從這種對話中也能夠不間斷的感受到二者的差異所在。“這是一個歡快、活潑對他...
圖書標籤: 社會學 Bourdieu 史學理論 sociology history E
搞曆史學的麵對搞社會學的韆萬不能虛
評分搞曆史學的麵對搞社會學的韆萬不能虛
評分搞曆史學的麵對搞社會學的韆萬不能虛
評分搞曆史學的麵對搞社會學的韆萬不能虛
評分搞曆史學的麵對搞社會學的韆萬不能虛
The Sociologist and the Historian 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載