觀點復雜,照此思路喬叟夢幻詩可以當古典文論去讀瞭(⊙x⊙;)。藉助medieval faculty psychology來分析從BD到HF再到PF中逐步進化的epistemological process很有啓發,最後一章從夢幻詩延伸看詩人整個創作軌跡(moving from "a poetics of interiority toward an understanding of social context and a grounding in historical experience" p.153)也很有說服力;論證很大程度上仍然受convention & originality框架的牽製,而且把夢境硬當做詩人對詩意創作的反思確實也有用力過猛之嫌(cf. Spearing 2011)。
评分觀點復雜,照此思路喬叟夢幻詩可以當古典文論去讀瞭(⊙x⊙;)。藉助medieval faculty psychology來分析從BD到HF再到PF中逐步進化的epistemological process很有啓發,最後一章從夢幻詩延伸看詩人整個創作軌跡(moving from "a poetics of interiority toward an understanding of social context and a grounding in historical experience" p.153)也很有說服力;論證很大程度上仍然受convention & originality框架的牽製,而且把夢境硬當做詩人對詩意創作的反思確實也有用力過猛之嫌(cf. Spearing 2011)。
评分觀點復雜,照此思路喬叟夢幻詩可以當古典文論去讀瞭(⊙x⊙;)。藉助medieval faculty psychology來分析從BD到HF再到PF中逐步進化的epistemological process很有啓發,最後一章從夢幻詩延伸看詩人整個創作軌跡(moving from "a poetics of interiority toward an understanding of social context and a grounding in historical experience" p.153)也很有說服力;論證很大程度上仍然受convention & originality框架的牽製,而且把夢境硬當做詩人對詩意創作的反思確實也有用力過猛之嫌(cf. Spearing 2011)。
评分觀點復雜,照此思路喬叟夢幻詩可以當古典文論去讀瞭(⊙x⊙;)。藉助medieval faculty psychology來分析從BD到HF再到PF中逐步進化的epistemological process很有啓發,最後一章從夢幻詩延伸看詩人整個創作軌跡(moving from "a poetics of interiority toward an understanding of social context and a grounding in historical experience" p.153)也很有說服力;論證很大程度上仍然受convention & originality框架的牽製,而且把夢境硬當做詩人對詩意創作的反思確實也有用力過猛之嫌(cf. Spearing 2011)。
评分觀點復雜,照此思路喬叟夢幻詩可以當古典文論去讀瞭(⊙x⊙;)。藉助medieval faculty psychology來分析從BD到HF再到PF中逐步進化的epistemological process很有啓發,最後一章從夢幻詩延伸看詩人整個創作軌跡(moving from "a poetics of interiority toward an understanding of social context and a grounding in historical experience" p.153)也很有說服力;論證很大程度上仍然受convention & originality框架的牽製,而且把夢境硬當做詩人對詩意創作的反思確實也有用力過猛之嫌(cf. Spearing 2011)。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有