Freedom in the Arab World

Wael Abu-ʿUksa is a Polonsky Fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and an assistant professor in the Political Science department at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was a visiting postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University, Massachusetts. During the course of his career, he received many grants and scholarships including the Stephen Robert Memorial Prize in Excellence and a Fulbright Postdoctoral Scholarship. His publications include Liberalism and Left in Arab Thought after 1990.

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Wael Abu-'Uksa

页数:245

出版时间:2016-7-4

价格:USD 99.99

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9781107161245

图书标签:思想史历史中东伊斯兰英文原版民主化比较政治思想

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

A preoccupation with the subject of freedom became a core issue in the construction of all modern political ideologies. Here, Wael Abu-'Uksa examines the development of the concept of freedom (hurriyya) in nineteenth-century Arab political thought, its ideological offshoots, their modes, and their substance as they developed the dynamics of the Arabic language. Abu-'Uksa traces the transition of the idea of freedom from a term used in a predominantly non-political way, through to its popularity and near ubiquity at the dawn of the twentieth century. Through this, he also analyzes the importance of associated concepts such as liberalism, socialism, progress, rationalism, secularism, and citizenship. He employs a close analysis of the development of the language, whilst at the same time examining the wider historical context within which these semantic shifts occurred: the rise of nationalism, the power of the Ottoman court, and the state of relations with Europe.

用户评价

细节非常丰富但是……细节过于丰富导致我好多地方看不清主线（写A人写着写着写到B人，写埃及写着写着就写到了大叙利亚）或许这就是我去不了剑桥的原因吧

人家的思想史怎么做的——“思想史”的核心是“史（料）”，不是“思想”

细节非常丰富但是……细节过于丰富导致我好多地方看不清主线（写A人写着写着写到B人，写埃及写着写着就写到了大叙利亚）或许这就是我去不了剑桥的原因吧

人家的思想史怎么做的——“思想史”的核心是“史（料）”，不是“思想”

人家的思想史怎么做的——“思想史”的核心是“史（料）”，不是“思想”