亨利·明茨伯格
當今世界上最傑齣的管理思想傢之一。加拿大麥吉爾大學(McGill)管理學院教授,戰略管理學會主席,在歐洲工商管理學院、倫敦商學院、埃剋斯一馬賽大學、卡內基.梅隆大學和濛特利爾高等商學院等學校擔任訪問學者。他曾兩次獲得《哈佛商業評論》所頒發的年度最佳文章“麥肯锡奬”。他最知名的著作《管理工作的本質》奠定瞭其管理大師地位。他對管理工作的觀察與研究,至今無人能超越。除此之外,他的代錶作還包括《管理者而非MBA》《明茨伯格論管理》《明茨伯格管理進行時》等。
In this definitive and revealing history, Henry Mintzberg, the iconoclastic former president of the Strategic Management Society, unmasks the press that has mesmerized so many organizations since 1965: strategic planning. One of our most brilliant and original management thinkers, Mintzberg concludes that the term is an oxymoron -- that strategy cannot be planned because planning is about analysis and strategy is about synthesis. That is why, he asserts, the process has failed so often and so dramatically. Mintzberg traces the origins and history of strategic planning through its prominence and subsequent fall. He argues that we must reconceive the process by which strategies are created -- by emphasizing informal learning and personal vision -- and the roles that can be played by planners. Mintzberg proposes new and unusual definitions of planning and strategy, and examines in novel and insightful ways the various models of strategic planning and the evidence of why they failed. Reviewing the so-called "pitfalls" of planning, he shows how the process itself can destroy commitment, narrow a company's vision, discourage change, and breed an atmosphere of politics. In a harsh critique of many sacred cows, he describes three basic fallacies of the process -- that discontinuities can be predicted, that strategists can be detached from the operations of the organization, and that the process of strategy-making itself can be formalized. Mintzberg devotes a substantial section to the new role for planning, plans, and planners, not inside the strategy-making process, but in support of it, providing some of its inputs and sometimes programming its outputs as well as encouraging strategic thinking in general. This book is required reading for anyone in an organization who is influenced by the planning or the strategy-making processes.
發表於2025-01-25
The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
本來不想對本書進行評論的,但針對翻譯和其它一些做法實在忍不住評論。 1 我不知道為何要翻譯成這個書名,但副標題“大敗局的分析”開始就誤導瞭我,以為會像《IT大敗局》、《大敗局》那樣針對企業的沉浮加以剖析,而且前麵的彩頁也留給我這樣的印象,但其實這本書更接近於學...
評分本來不想對本書進行評論的,但針對翻譯和其它一些做法實在忍不住評論。 1 我不知道為何要翻譯成這個書名,但副標題“大敗局的分析”開始就誤導瞭我,以為會像《IT大敗局》、《大敗局》那樣針對企業的沉浮加以剖析,而且前麵的彩頁也留給我這樣的印象,但其實這本書更接近於學...
評分 評分 評分本來不想對本書進行評論的,但針對翻譯和其它一些做法實在忍不住評論。 1 我不知道為何要翻譯成這個書名,但副標題“大敗局的分析”開始就誤導瞭我,以為會像《IT大敗局》、《大敗局》那樣針對企業的沉浮加以剖析,而且前麵的彩頁也留給我這樣的印象,但其實這本書更接近於學...
圖書標籤: 戰略 計劃
有學院派的嚴謹,犀利,比波特囉裏囉嗦的文風不知道高到哪裏去瞭。
評分有學院派的嚴謹,犀利,比波特囉裏囉嗦的文風不知道高到哪裏去瞭。
評分有學院派的嚴謹,犀利,比波特囉裏囉嗦的文風不知道高到哪裏去瞭。
評分有學院派的嚴謹,犀利,比波特囉裏囉嗦的文風不知道高到哪裏去瞭。
評分有學院派的嚴謹,犀利,比波特囉裏囉嗦的文風不知道高到哪裏去瞭。
The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載