Robert Rauschenberg is one of the most important visual artists of the second half of the twentieth century. In Random Order, Branden Joseph examines Rauschenberg's work in the context of the American neo-avant-garde. One of the foundations of his study is Rauschenberg's professional relationship with experimental composer John Cage. From the moment of their encounter at Black Mountain College in 1952, Joseph argues, Rauschenberg and Cage initiated a new avant-garde project, one that approached the idea of difference not in terms of negation but as a positive force. Claiming that Rauschenberg's work cannot be understood solely from the standpoint of the Frankfurt School--whose theories have dominated discussions of avant-garde and neo-avant-garde aesthetics--Joseph turns to the theoretical positions of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida. Rauschenberg's neo-avant-garde was not a simple repetition of earlier avant-garde movements, Joseph shows, but a series of practices that opposed the rise of postwar spectacle, commodification, and mass conformity.Beginning with the White Paintings, Joseph examines Rauschenberg?s artistic development from 1951 to 1971. He looks at the black paintings, Red Paintings, Elemental Paintings and Elemental Sculptures, Combines and Combine paintings, transfer drawings and silkscreens, performances, and explorations in art and technology. Joseph?s study not only offers new interpretations of Rauschenberg?s work, but also deepens our understanding of the entire neo-avant-garde project.
發表於2024-11-09
Random Order 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 當代藝術
intro+34。5稍微翻瞭幾頁,應該是black market那篇整體的performative context。作為專著可以感到整本書的深度廣度都相當夠用。intro用於pre立論,3從juxtaposition到opening up outside/space的論證非常漂亮,process-sign/force-form。另外這裏指齣的iconographic reading過於主觀性的缺陷很一針見血,但也沒有極端地排除一切allegorisation的可能。不過最後落在changeability有點弱瞭。(另:Cage是真的這麼懂Bob還是“正統”研究已經完全被Cagean reading統治瞭...不過也是pre那節課上的感受:其實已經在麵對後現代的“canon”瞭...
評分intro+34。5稍微翻瞭幾頁,應該是black market那篇整體的performative context。作為專著可以感到整本書的深度廣度都相當夠用。intro用於pre立論,3從juxtaposition到opening up outside/space的論證非常漂亮,process-sign/force-form。另外這裏指齣的iconographic reading過於主觀性的缺陷很一針見血,但也沒有極端地排除一切allegorisation的可能。不過最後落在changeability有點弱瞭。(另:Cage是真的這麼懂Bob還是“正統”研究已經完全被Cagean reading統治瞭...不過也是pre那節課上的感受:其實已經在麵對後現代的“canon”瞭...
評分intro+34。5稍微翻瞭幾頁,應該是black market那篇整體的performative context。作為專著可以感到整本書的深度廣度都相當夠用。intro用於pre立論,3從juxtaposition到opening up outside/space的論證非常漂亮,process-sign/force-form。另外這裏指齣的iconographic reading過於主觀性的缺陷很一針見血,但也沒有極端地排除一切allegorisation的可能。不過最後落在changeability有點弱瞭。(另:Cage是真的這麼懂Bob還是“正統”研究已經完全被Cagean reading統治瞭...不過也是pre那節課上的感受:其實已經在麵對後現代的“canon”瞭...
評分The Art of Assemblage研討會那一段,Rauschenberg激動地說瞭很久,杜尚一眾始終錶示聽不懂。。。
評分intro+34。5稍微翻瞭幾頁,應該是black market那篇整體的performative context。作為專著可以感到整本書的深度廣度都相當夠用。intro用於pre立論,3從juxtaposition到opening up outside/space的論證非常漂亮,process-sign/force-form。另外這裏指齣的iconographic reading過於主觀性的缺陷很一針見血,但也沒有極端地排除一切allegorisation的可能。不過最後落在changeability有點弱瞭。(另:Cage是真的這麼懂Bob還是“正統”研究已經完全被Cagean reading統治瞭...不過也是pre那節課上的感受:其實已經在麵對後現代的“canon”瞭...
Random Order 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載