"Why doesn't she just open up her ears and listen?" Few physical problems are as poorly understood as hearing loss. In "Missed Connections", a new kind of self-help book that combines sociological reporting with personal reflection, sociologist Barbara Stenross examines what hearing loss feels like to those who have it and which technologies and strategies can improve communication at home and in public. Based on seven years of research, Stenross' book tells of how as she sought information and solutions to help her hard-of-hearing father she came to join a community group called Village Self Help for Hard-of-Hearing People.Taking us along to group meetings and into the homes of members, Stenross shows us through the personal accounts of these individuals the exhaustion that comes from constantly straining to listen, the frustration of missing critical comments or the punchlines of jokes, and the pain that hard-of-hearing family members experience when loved ones accuse them of hearing "when they want to." Full of scenes, dialogues, and conversations, "Missed Connections" also discusses such practical issues as how people with impaired hearing can continue to use the phone, how assistive technologies can help in public and private, why hearing aids can't always do enough, and how bluffing and silence can hurt more than help.Understanding that when one family member is hard-of-hearing, the whole family can suffer from "missed connections," Stenross offers in this book a useful family resource with a broad range of practical guidance. With chapters on belonging and acceptance, do's and don'ts in public, lip-reading, hearing aids, and television, "Missed Connections" will interest a range of readers including deaf and hard-of-hearing people as well as their families, teachers, friends, employers, and counselors healthcare professionals, scholars, and others interested in the experiences of and solutions for disability and hearing loss. Author note: Barbara Stenross teaches sociology and serves as Assistant Dean of the General College at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,我一开始是被这个封面吸引的,那种略带复古的色调和模糊的构图,预示着一种隐秘而深远的故事。然而,真正吸引我的是作者叙事声音的独特性。它不像传统小说那样线性推进,而是像一首结构复杂的交响乐,不同的主题和时间线在适当的时候交汇、碰撞,然后又回归于平静。书中对于城市景观的描摹达到了近乎冷峻的精确度,每一个地标性的建筑、每一条不起眼的巷弄,都承载了某种不为人知的历史重量。我尤其欣赏作者对“沉默”的运用,很多重要的信息是通过人物的肢体语言、一个眼神的停顿、或者长时间的寂静来传达的,这种留白的处理极高明,迫使读者必须主动参与到意义的构建中去。它挑战了传统叙事中对“解释一切”的需要,更像是一份邀请函,邀请你一同去感受那些未被言说的重量。读起来需要专注,但回报是丰厚的。
评分这是一部需要细细品味的文字艺术品。它的魅力不在于情节的曲折离奇,而在于文字本身的质感和音韵。作者对于意象的运用达到了近乎迷信的程度,每一个重复出现的小物件——一盏特定的路灯、某种特定气味的咖啡、甚至是一件遗失的配饰——都像一个幽灵般的符号,在不同的场景下回荡,构建起一种强烈的宿命感。文风上,它有着某种古典的韵味,即使描写现代场景,也带着一种穿越时空的疏离美。我发现自己经常会停下来,仅仅是为了重读某个句子,感受其内部的节奏和韵律。它探讨的“错过”并非仅仅是爱情上的,更深一层,是对自我身份、对潜能的错过。这本书让人深思,我们究竟有多少选择,只是因为在错误的时间出现在了错误的地点,而永远地留在了“如果”的维度里。这是一部深刻、忧郁,且极富文学性的佳作。
评分我一直以为,要写好现代都市背景下的情感纠葛,很容易陷入陈词滥调,但这本书彻底颠覆了我的看法。它并没有用宏大的背景来烘托人物,而是将聚光灯精准地对准了那些在庞大社会机器中显得渺小而孤立的个体。作者对社会观察的敏锐度令人印象深刻,无论是职场的冷漠,还是网络时代信息过载带来的疏离感,都被融入得恰到好处,它们不再是背景,而是直接推动情节发展的隐形力量。角色的矛盾性处理得非常立体,没有绝对的好人或坏人,只有在特定压力下做出反应的、有血有肉的人。我特别欣赏作者在结构上的大胆尝试,比如偶尔插入的、看似无关紧要的旁观者视角,这些“侧影”非但没有打断主线,反而从另一个维度丰富了主题的探讨深度。对于追求文本复杂性和多义性的读者来说,这本书无疑是一次酣畅淋漓的阅读体验。
评分这本书给我的感觉,就像是翻阅一本尘封已久的日记本,那些片段式的记录,充满了未经修饰的、原始的情感爆发。作者对日常对话的捕捉尤其到位,那些看似漫不经心、实则暗藏玄机的交流,精准地还原了人际关系中的那种微妙的试探与防备。我尤其欣赏其中对“记忆的不可靠性”这一哲学命题的文学化处理。故事中的角色似乎都在与自己脑海中构建的过去搏斗,现实与回忆的边界模糊不清,让人不禁反思自己记忆的真实性。叙事节奏上,它时而急促如骤雨,时而缓慢如滴水,这种强烈的张弛感,完美地烘托了角色内心的焦虑。它不是一个给你明确答案的故事,而更像是一面镜子,让你在阅读的过程中,清晰地看到自己生命中那些未曾解决的“连接点”。读完后,我花了很长时间才从那种沉浸感中抽离出来,这本书的后劲实在太大了。
评分这本书的故事情节发展得非常自然,人物的内心挣扎和成长轨迹刻画得入木三分。我特别喜欢作者在描述环境和氛围时所使用的细腻笔触,仿佛能亲身感受到故事中那些湿润的街道和朦胧的灯光。主角在面对选择时的犹豫和最终的决断,那种复杂的情绪层次感,真的让人唏嘘不已。它不是那种大开大合的叙事,更多的是对日常生活碎片化的捕捉与重塑,用一种近乎诗意的语言,探讨了时间流逝中人与人之间那些若有似无的牵绊。每一次翻页,都像是走进了一个由光影和低语构筑起来的迷宫,既感到迷失,又沉醉于其中。尤其是关于“错失”这一主题的处理,没有落入俗套的煽情,而是用一种克制而有力的笔调,揭示了生命中许多不可逆转的瞬间是如何塑造了现在的我们。读完之后,心中久久不能平静,那种淡淡的忧伤和对未知的憧憬交织在一起,久久不散。我强烈推荐给那些喜欢慢节奏、注重人物心理刻画的读者。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有