Smoking and Politics

出版者:Prentice Hall

作者:A. Lee Fritschler

页数:160

出版时间:2006-06-26

价格:USD 48.20

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780131791046

具体描述

For use as a principal assignment for intermediate-level courses in public policy, public administration, government regulation of the economy, public health, and administrative law and as a supplemental text for introductory courses in American Government. The book is designed to help students understand the central role of the bureaucracy in policy-making. It examines formal rulemaking procedures as well as the informal and political aspects of decisionmaking. The book considers policymaking as a system including the president, Congress, the courts, private sector actors, state governments, and the Federal bureaucracy. And, the volume considers questions raised by the extensive role of bureaucracies in policymaking in a democracy The authors wrote this text to show that bureaucratic decision making is frequently exciting, an important element of political strategy, and potentially momentous in its results. Not only do many people not realize the scope of the policy making activities of the federal bureaucracy, they do not understand the procedures employed in making that policy and thus have little opportunity to participate meaningfully in bureaucratic policy making. The authors aim to help students of government understand the importance of this area and make them more effective participants in these processes. Upon completing this volume, readers will have not only a solid grasp of bureaucratic policy making but also of the political maneuvering that underlies any issue whose outcome will produce winners and losers. There is very little in American government texts about the role of bureaucracy in policymaking. Public policy in practice rarely fits the structural, formalistic explanations often offered of the making of policy. Policymaking dynamically crisscrosses levels and branches of government, public and private sectors, and domestic and international boundaries, thus confounding traditional approaches to the teaching of American government. Smoking and Politics engagingly captures these dynamics as they play out over time. The new 6th edition is a part of the Paul S. Hernnson (Editor) series Real Politics in America. Recognizing the centrality and complexity of modern bureaucracy and public policymaking, Smoking and Politics helps readers understand how most policy is made in modern governments. An excellent example of scholarship focused on an important issue in public policy.

用户评价

这本书最让我感到不适的地方，在于它那种居高临下的、预设读者已经拥有某种前置知识的态度。作者似乎默认读者与他处于同一个知识水平线上，因此毫不留情地跳过了必要的背景介绍和基础概念的解释。这导致我在阅读的初期就陷入了深深的困惑之中，不得不频繁地停下来查阅资料，这极大地破坏了阅读的沉浸感。仿佛作者在对一群同僚进行内部交流，而我这个“外来者”只能揣测着他们谈话的深层含义。这种写作姿态，虽然在某种程度上展现了作者的自信和专业性，但在广义的传播效果上无疑是适得其反的。它将自己包裹在一层厚厚的“精英主义”外壳之下，让渴望了解其核心观点的普通读者望而却步。如果作者的目标受众不仅仅是极少数的专家，那么这种表达方式是需要深刻反思的，因为它最终可能导致其最有价值的见解，只在狭小的圈子里低语流传，而无法产生更广泛的社会影响。

我必须承认，这本书在资料搜集和引证方面是令人敬佩的。作者似乎耗费了大量时间在尘封的档案和偏僻的文献中进行挖掘，这一点从大量的注释和参考文献中可见一斑。然而，这种对“证据”的过度依赖，似乎让文本本身失去了生命力。它更像是一份详尽的学术报告，而不是一部引人入胜的作品。书中的论述充满了各种专业术语和晦涩难懂的行话，每一次阅读都像是在进行一场词汇测试。如果作者能在保持其学术严谨性的同时，用更具感染力的叙事手法来包装这些冰冷的事实，这本书的价值或许能得到更广泛的体现。目前的版本，实在是太“干”了，缺乏必要的润滑剂。它更适合被放在图书馆的参考书架上，供专业人士查阅特定数据，而不是被推荐给大众读者进行知识探索。每一次尝试阅读，都感觉像是在咀嚼一块没有调味的干粮，虽然营养丰富，但过程十分煎熬。

翻开这本书，最先感受到的是那种扑面而来的学术气息，厚重得让人有些喘不过气来。作者的语言风格极其严谨，每一个动词、每一个形容词的选择都像是经过了千百次的推敲和锤炼，力求达到一种近乎完美的精确性。然而，这种过度的精确性，反而扼杀了阅读的流畅性和趣味性。它不是那种能让你在咖啡馆里轻松翻阅的书籍，而更像是需要全神贯注、甚至需要配上放大镜才能理解的古籍。书中的论证过程极其细密，像是编织一张无懈可击的逻辑网，但代价是，它牺牲了对普通读者的友好度。我花了好大力气才跟上作者的思维跳跃，那种感觉就像是跟着一个语速极快的播音员在听一场极其专业的讲座，你必须全神贯注，稍有走神便可能错过关键的转折点。对于那些对特定历史背景或社会理论不甚了解的读者来说，这本书的门槛设置得太高了，它似乎更倾向于服务于已经身处“圈子”内的专业人士，而不是致力于普及知识。

这本书，恕我直言，简直是把历史的尘埃和哲学思辨揉成了一团难以消化的粘土。阅读的过程更像是在迷宫里摸索，每当你以为抓住了作者抛出的某个关键论点时，它又如同沙子般从指缝间溜走。作者似乎对时间的概念有着一种近乎偏执的迷恋，总是不厌其烦地将不同时代的片段生硬地拼凑在一起，试图构建某种宏大的叙事结构，但结果却是支离破碎，让人费解。我尤其对其中对于“权力结构”的探讨感到困惑，它用了一整章的篇幅去阐述一个本可以用三句话说清楚的观点，大量的脚注和引文堆砌，让读者不得不像考古学家一样，小心翼翼地挖掘出文本背后的真正意图。这种故作高深的写作手法，在我看来，与其说是深度，不如说是故作玄虚。如果你期待的是清晰的逻辑线索和一目了然的论证过程，那么这本书会让你感到极度的挫败。它更像是一场文学游戏，作者是唯一的玩家，而读者只是被动地旁观着这场自娱自乐的表演。最后合上书页时，脑海中留下的不是知识的充实，而是一种被信息洪流淹没后的疲惫感。

这本书的结构安排得十分奇特，与其说是一本书，不如说是一系列互不关联的散文和笔记的合集。章节之间的过渡显得非常突兀，仿佛作者只是将他脑中闪现的各种想法不加修饰地倾倒在了纸上。我尝试寻找一条贯穿始终的主线索，但每次都以失败告终。例如，某一章还在深入分析某个小众的社会现象，下一章就突然跳跃到了对某种抽象概念的模糊探讨，两者之间的联系需要读者自己去费力地构建，这对于阅读体验来说是一个巨大的挑战。这种碎片化的叙事方式，无疑考验着读者的联想能力和耐心。虽然在某些特定的段落中，确实能捕捉到一些闪光的洞察力，但这些亮点很快就被其他无关紧要的细节所淹没。整本书读下来，给我留下了一种“很多很多想法，但没有一个被彻底讲透”的遗憾感。它更像是一个尚未完成的草稿，而不是一部经过精心打磨的成品。

It is an excellent example of scholarship, which examines formal rulemaking procedures as well as the informal and political aspects of decision making, gives me a fresh view of the central role of the bureaucracy in policy-making.

It is an excellent example of scholarship, which examines formal rulemaking procedures as well as the informal and political aspects of decision making, gives me a fresh view of the central role of the bureaucracy in policy-making.

It is an excellent example of scholarship, which examines formal rulemaking procedures as well as the informal and political aspects of decision making, gives me a fresh view of the central role of the bureaucracy in policy-making.

It is an excellent example of scholarship, which examines formal rulemaking procedures as well as the informal and political aspects of decision making, gives me a fresh view of the central role of the bureaucracy in policy-making.

very good case study about policymaking in bureaucracy.Try to answer the question why tobacco is a legal and thriving industry despite the dangers it caused. Introduce two major govt agencies: FDA and FTC.