Public Opinion and Political Change in China

Wenfang Tang is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pittsburgh.

出版者:Stanford University Press

作者:Wenfang Tang

页数:268

出版时间:2005-8-16

价格:USD 24.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780804752206

图书标签:政治学海外中国研究中国政治威权韧性威权主义传播学英文原版舆论学

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

This book describes through case studies how various factors, such as the single-party political system, traditional culture, market reform, and industrialization, shape public opinion and mass political behavior in urban China. Case studies focus on the process of conducting public opinion polls in China’s political environment, regime legitimacy and reform support, media control and censorship, interpersonal trust and democratization, mass political participation, labor relations and trade unions, and the role of intellectuals in political change.

The book draws most of its empirical evidence from twelve Chinese public opinion surveys conducted between the late 1980s and the late 1990s. The same questions repeated in many of these surveys provide a rare opportunity to examine the changing pattern of the Chinese public mind during this period. The book ends with the provocative conclusion that China’s authoritarian political system proved to be less effective than traditional culture, marketization, and industrialization in shaping public opinion and mass political behavior. Liberal ideas and bottom-up political participation can emerge even in the absence of direct elections.

读后感

全书主要运用的还是政治学OLS回归分析法，虽然依然质疑统计中的水分到底多么大，不过其科学性和可信性还是有的。值得一看，起码在统计方法上提供一个范例和启示。

比如说reference多处有很搞笑的问题，有的是一条跟在另一条后面未分开；最搞笑的是99条，后面还有一段问句，应该是翻译者和原作者之间的谈论，没审阅清楚就发上来了。我个人觉得简体书对于参考文献的重视程度不够，有的书会去翻译这部分，结果是阅读者在正文中阅读后在参考文献...  

全书主要运用的还是政治学OLS回归分析法，虽然依然质疑统计中的水分到底多么大，不过其科学性和可信性还是有的。值得一看，起码在统计方法上提供一个范例和启示。

全书主要运用的还是政治学OLS回归分析法，虽然依然质疑统计中的水分到底多么大，不过其科学性和可信性还是有的。值得一看，起码在统计方法上提供一个范例和启示。

比如说reference多处有很搞笑的问题，有的是一条跟在另一条后面未分开；最搞笑的是99条，后面还有一段问句，应该是翻译者和原作者之间的谈论，没审阅清楚就发上来了。我个人觉得简体书对于参考文献的重视程度不够，有的书会去翻译这部分，结果是阅读者在正文中阅读后在参考文献...  

用户评价

valuable data without methodological rigor

valuable data without methodological rigor

介中国政体具体怎么回事，我才知道。

介中国政体具体怎么回事，我才知道。

介中国政体具体怎么回事，我才知道。