中国已经成为理解比较政治经济学的重要案例,很高兴能够看到这些著作的出版。
——PeterGourevitch
在过去的三十年里,比较政治经济学领域成为理解不同资本主义模式的关键,而这套丛书则致力于出版这个领域内最重要的著作。它们是理解政经互动所不可缺少的篇章,而现代世界正是这个互动所创造的。
——PeterHall
这套丛书的出版激动人心,这也是连接中西学者的重要步骤。这些书将增进全球的学术和理念的交流。
——DaVidKang
在中国出版这套比较政治经济学丛书的重要性是怎样强调都不过分的。它将促进中国学者、学生与世界的对话。
——JoeIMigdaI
发表于2024-11-24
Dismantling the Welfare State? 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 政治学 社会学 比较政治 法学 政治经济学 公共政策 Historical-Sociology 英文原版
This book offers a careful examination of the politics of social policy in an era of austerity and conservative governance. Focusing on the administrations of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, Pierson provides a compelling explanation for the welfare state's durability and for the few occasions where each government was able to achieve significant cutbacks. The programmes of the modern welfare state - the 'policy legacies' of previous governments - generally proved resistant to reform. Hemmed in by the political supports that have developed around mature social programmes, conservative opponents of the welfare state were successful only when they were able to divide the supporters of social programmes, compensate those negatively affected, or hide what they were doing from potential critics. The book will appeal to those interested in the politics of neo-conservatism as well as those concerned about the development of the modern welfare state. It will attract readers in the fields of comparative politics, public policy, and political economy.
chapters 1 & 2 // argues the idea that Thatcher and Reagan administrations did not turn back the clock or dismantle the welfare state by listing various political difficulties
评分chapters 1 & 2 // argues the idea that Thatcher and Reagan administrations did not turn back the clock or dismantle the welfare state by listing various political difficulties
评分在Espinge给他的福利资本主义三个世界的日文版作序的时候,提到了这样一个微妙的猜想。他断言80年代日本新自由主义改革的“进步”源自在日本福利制度的保卫者或者受益者团体是多么的稀少。这多少是一个在日本人看起来多少有些奇妙的假说,自然,路径依赖从事后来看,只有在现有的变革受到阻力的时候,我们才能事后合理的推论历史上某一时间点上的制度或者习惯在往后起到了重要的作用。但是时间的流逝本身是无从保证任何路径依赖得以形成的。就此书所享有的名气和后来路径依存所引起的过概念的争论来看,就实证研究中,尤其是福利资本主义改革的比较政治经济学的研究之中,这个概念多少成了狗皮膏药,在合适的地方合适的国家合适的案例贴一贴就好的某种label。此书的案例研究做的其实还是很不错的,值得学习一下
评分在Espinge给他的福利资本主义三个世界的日文版作序的时候,提到了这样一个微妙的猜想。他断言80年代日本新自由主义改革的“进步”源自在日本福利制度的保卫者或者受益者团体是多么的稀少。这多少是一个在日本人看起来多少有些奇妙的假说,自然,路径依赖从事后来看,只有在现有的变革受到阻力的时候,我们才能事后合理的推论历史上某一时间点上的制度或者习惯在往后起到了重要的作用。但是时间的流逝本身是无从保证任何路径依赖得以形成的。就此书所享有的名气和后来路径依存所引起的过概念的争论来看,就实证研究中,尤其是福利资本主义改革的比较政治经济学的研究之中,这个概念多少成了狗皮膏药,在合适的地方合适的国家合适的案例贴一贴就好的某种label。此书的案例研究做的其实还是很不错的,值得学习一下
评分chapters 1 & 2 // argues the idea that Thatcher and Reagan administrations did not turn back the clock or dismantle the welfare state by listing various political difficulties
Dismantling the Welfare State? 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书