Martha Finnemore is University Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University. She is the author of National Interests in International Society and coauthor, with Michael Barnett, of Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (both from Cornell).
Winner of the 2004 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award (American Political Science Association)
Violence or the potential for violence is a fact of human existence. Many societies, including our own, reward martial success or skill at arms. The ways in which members of a particular society use force reveal a great deal about the nature of authority within the group and about its members' priorities.
Martha Finnemore uses one type of force, military intervention, as a window onto the shifting character of international society. She examines the changes, over the past 400 years, in why countries intervene militarily as well as in the ways they have intervened. It is not the fact of intervention that has altered, she says, but rather the reasons for and meaning behind intervention—the conventional understanding of the purposes for which states can and should use force.
Finnemore looks at three types of intervention: collecting debts, addressing humanitarian crises, and acting against states perceived as threats to international peace. In all three, she finds that what is now considered "obvious" was vigorously contested or even rejected by people in earlier periods for well-articulated and logical reasons. A broad historical perspective allows her to explicate long-term trends: the steady erosion of force's normative value in international politics, the growing influence of equality norms in many aspects of global political life, and the increasing importance of law in intervention practices.
發表於2024-12-26
The Purpose of Intervention 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
正如前言所講,本書的寫作目的就在於試圖就那些“並非齣自必要性”而是齣於某種信念所發生的大國軍事行動做齣一些可能的解釋。 本書的思想淵源大緻是兩個,一個是韋伯的閤法性、有效性結構一個是哈耶剋的自發秩序的概念(自發秩序好像沒有明確提及,屬於個人意淫...
評分正如前言所講,本書的寫作目的就在於試圖就那些“並非齣自必要性”而是齣於某種信念所發生的大國軍事行動做齣一些可能的解釋。 本書的思想淵源大緻是兩個,一個是韋伯的閤法性、有效性結構一個是哈耶剋的自發秩序的概念(自發秩序好像沒有明確提及,屬於個人意淫...
評分正如前言所講,本書的寫作目的就在於試圖就那些“並非齣自必要性”而是齣於某種信念所發生的大國軍事行動做齣一些可能的解釋。 本書的思想淵源大緻是兩個,一個是韋伯的閤法性、有效性結構一個是哈耶剋的自發秩序的概念(自發秩序好像沒有明確提及,屬於個人意淫...
評分正如前言所講,本書的寫作目的就在於試圖就那些“並非齣自必要性”而是齣於某種信念所發生的大國軍事行動做齣一些可能的解釋。 本書的思想淵源大緻是兩個,一個是韋伯的閤法性、有效性結構一個是哈耶剋的自發秩序的概念(自發秩序好像沒有明確提及,屬於個人意淫...
評分正如前言所講,本書的寫作目的就在於試圖就那些“並非齣自必要性”而是齣於某種信念所發生的大國軍事行動做齣一些可能的解釋。 本書的思想淵源大緻是兩個,一個是韋伯的閤法性、有效性結構一個是哈耶剋的自發秩序的概念(自發秩序好像沒有明確提及,屬於個人意淫...
圖書標籤: 國際政治 Life
Generally an IR oriented work.
評分Generally an IR oriented work.
評分Generally an IR oriented work.
評分Generally an IR oriented work.
評分Generally an IR oriented work.
The Purpose of Intervention 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載