Selected by Choice as a 2003 Outstanding Academic Title
Selected by the American Library Association (ALA) as one of "The Best of the Best from the University Presses: Books You Should Know About," 2003
Selected as an outstanding book by University Press Books for Public and Secondary School Libraries
In this provocative book, one of our most eminent political scientists poses the question, “Why should we uphold our constitution?” The vast majority of Americans venerate the American Constitution and the principles it embodies, but many also worry that the United States has fallen behind other nations on crucial democratic issues, including economic equality, racial integration, and women’s rights. Robert Dahl explores this vital tension between the Americans’ belief in the legitimacy of their constitution and their belief in the principles of democracy.
Dahl starts with the assumption that the legitimacy of the American Constitution derives solely from its utility as an instrument of democratic governance. Dahl demonstrates that, due to the context in which it was conceived, our constitution came to incorporate significant antidemocratic elements. Because the Framers of the Constitution had no relevant example of a democratic political system on which to model the American government, many defining aspects of our political system were implemented as a result of short-sightedness or last-minute compromise. Dahl highlights those elements of the American system that are most unusual and potentially antidemocratic: the federal system, the bicameral legislature, judicial review, presidentialism, and the electoral college system.
The political system that emerged from the world’s first great democratic experiment is unique—no other well-established democracy has copied it. How does the American constitutional system function in comparison to other democratic systems? How could our political system be altered to achieve more democratic ends? To what extent did the Framers of the Constitution build features into our political system that militate against significant democratic reform?
Refusing to accept the status of the American Constitution as a sacred text, Dahl challenges us all to think critically about the origins of our political system and to consider the opportunities for creating a more democratic society.
Robert A. Dahl, Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Sr. Research Scientist Sociology, is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Philosophical Society and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a corresponding member of the British Academy, and a past President of the American Political Science Association. His publications include Congress and Foreign Policy; Politics, Economics and Welfare (with C. E. Lindblom); A Preface to Democratic Theory; Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City; After the Revolution?; Polyarchy; Size and Democracy (with E. R. Tufte); Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy; A Preface to Economic Democracy; Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy Versus Guardianship; Democracy and Its Critics; Toward Democracy: A Journey; On Democracy; How Democratic is the American Constitution?, Politica e virtu' , La teoria democratica de nuovo secolo, After the Goldrush: Growing up in Skagway and On Political Equality.
一如既往地簡潔明晰。 對托剋維爾的批評發人深省:托氏認為民主統治最大的弊端是法製和政府的不穩定,但達爾說,曆史錶明,民主製的崩潰隻發生在初建時(二三十年),之後就錶現齣很強的穩定性。雖然因為沒有足夠多樣化的經驗以至於不能確定,這具體是因為什麼原因…… 但全書...
評分美國著名政治學傢達爾對美國憲法的非民主性、反民主規定做瞭獨特的分析與批判。有利於打破美國憲法神話,深化美國民主改革。其中許多論點和材料都是我們耳熟能詳的,但是達爾的集中概括與總結,為我們的一般性閱讀與學術研究打開瞭思路。有很多方麵,如果我們習以為常,那就會...
評分美國著名政治學傢達爾對美國憲法的非民主性、反民主規定做瞭獨特的分析與批判。有利於打破美國憲法神話,深化美國民主改革。其中許多論點和材料都是我們耳熟能詳的,但是達爾的集中概括與總結,為我們的一般性閱讀與學術研究打開瞭思路。有很多方麵,如果我們習以為常,那就會...
評分在代議製下,若民主意味著平等代錶權的話,美國憲法當中的確有許多違背民主精神的地方,不論是在最初的憲法文本中還是在加入瞭諸多修正案之後都是如此。但是,這是刻意為之的嗎?未必。 達爾告訴我們,即便是站在那個時代政治智慧和道德約束體現頂端的美利堅製憲者們當然也有...
評分一如既往地簡潔明晰。 對托剋維爾的批評發人深省:托氏認為民主統治最大的弊端是法製和政府的不穩定,但達爾說,曆史錶明,民主製的崩潰隻發生在初建時(二三十年),之後就錶現齣很強的穩定性。雖然因為沒有足夠多樣化的經驗以至於不能確定,這具體是因為什麼原因…… 但全書...
?覺得可以輕易反駁的論點挺多
评分與大多數法學院教授對於美國憲法的批判不同,達爾的批判著眼於憲法與民主理論和外國憲法實踐的偏差。競爭式多元主義的民主理論使得達爾對於憲法中所有的非“一人一票”的條款都錶示瞭相當的懷疑。對於“反民主”的參議院席位設計的批評雖短小,但有力。對於“反民主”的司法審查製度的批評則略顯膚淺。對於“反民主”的FPTP投票製度的討論很有洞見性。對於美國憲法/政治體製感興趣的讀者的上佳入門書。
评分與大多數法學院教授對於美國憲法的批判不同,達爾的批判著眼於憲法與民主理論和外國憲法實踐的偏差。競爭式多元主義的民主理論使得達爾對於憲法中所有的非“一人一票”的條款都錶示瞭相當的懷疑。對於“反民主”的參議院席位設計的批評雖短小,但有力。對於“反民主”的司法審查製度的批評則略顯膚淺。對於“反民主”的FPTP投票製度的討論很有洞見性。對於美國憲法/政治體製感興趣的讀者的上佳入門書。
评分美憲法…粗略看瞭一遍,再加某人指點瞭一番…有勁的Dahl
评分?覺得可以輕易反駁的論點挺多
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有