David Horowitz underwent the most dramatic political conversion since Whittaker Chambers. And at every stop of his intellectual journey, he has produced sparkling and provocative commentary. From his youthful days as a leader of the New Left in the 1960s to his current role as master strategist of the right, Horowitzs polemical legacy is unmatched in wit and integrity.
Horowitzs newest book, Left Illusions: An Intellectual Odyssey, provides the first map of his intellectual development. Complementing his acclaimed autobiography, Radical Son, the selections in Left Illusions range from his first book, published over forty years ago, to his most recent writings on the war against terror. The pieces include his polemics, journalism, and scholarship, along with select chapters from most of his books. Their subjects range from the origins of the New Left to the Cold War, from the fall of communism to political radicalism, race relations, the war on terror, the intellectual culture wars, and modern conservatism. Twenty-eight of the selections have not been published in book form or are contained in texts that are generally unavailable.
"I make no apologies for my present position," Horowitz writes. "My values have not changed, but my sense of what supports them and makes them possible has." He became profoundly disillusioned with the radical movement because of a tragedy both personal and political. The whole fascinating story is here for the reader to follow as it unfolded. Left Illusions is really the story of our times, lived out by an extraordinary individual.
David Horowitz grew up a “red diaper baby” in a communist community in Sunnyside, Queens. He studied literature at Columbia, taking classes from Lionel Trilling, and became a "new leftist" during the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. He did his graduate work in Chinese and English at the University of California, arriving in Berkeley in the fall of 1959. At Berkeley, he was a member of a group of radicals who in 1960 published one of the first New Left magazines, Root and Branch. In 1962 he published the first manifesto of the New Left, a book titled, Student, which described the decade’s first demonstrations.
Horowitz went to Sweden in the fall of 1962 where he began writing The Free World Colossus, his most influential leftist book. In the fall of 1963 he moved to England where he went to work for the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation and became a protege of the Polish Marxist biographer of Trotsky, Issac Deutscher, and Ralph Miliband, an English Marxist whose sons went on to become leaders of the British Labour Party. While in England Horowitz also wrote Shakespeare: An Existential View, which was published by Tavistock Books. Under the influence of Deutscher, he also wrote Empire and Revolution: A Radical Interpretation of Contemporary History, 1969.
In 1967, Horowitz returned to the U.S. to join the staff of Ramparts Magazine, which had become a major cultural influence on the left. In 1969 he and Peter Collier, who became his lifelong friend and collaborator, took over the editorship of the magazine. Collier and Horowitz left Ramparts in 1973 to write three best selling dynastic biographies: The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty (1976); The Kennedys: An American Dream (1984); and The Fords: An American Epic (1987).
During these years Horowitz wrote two other books, The Fate of Midas, a collection of his Marxist essays and The First Frontier, a book about the creation of the United States. Following the murder of his friend Betty van Patter by the Black Panther Party in December 1972 and the victory of the Communists in Indo-China, which led to the slaughter of millions of Asians, Horowitz and Collier had second thoughts about their former comrades and commitments. In 1985 they published a cover story in the Washington Post called "Lefties for Reagan," announcing their new politics and organized a Second Thoughts Conference in Washington composed of former radicals. Four years later they published a book of the articles they had written about their new perspective and themovement they had left which they called Destructive Generation.
In 1997, Horowitz published a memoir, Radical Son(1996), about his journey from the left. George Gilder hailed it as “the first great autobiography of his generation,” and others compared the book to Whittaker Chambers' Witness.
In 1988, Horowitz and Collier created The Center for the Study of Popular Culture (the name was changed in 2006 to the David Horowitz Freedom Center) — to create a platform for his campaigns against the Left and its anti-American agendas. The DHFC is currently supported by over 100,000 individual contributors and publishes FrontpageMagazine.com, which features articles on “the war at home and abroad,” and receives approximately a million visitors per month. In 1992, Collier and Horowitz launched Heterodoxy, a print journal which confronted the phenomenon of "political correctness" focusing on the world of academia for the next ten years. In the same year he and film writer Lionel Chewynd created the "Wednesday Morning Club," the first sustained conservative presence in Hollywood in a generation. In 1996 Horowitz created the Restoration Weekend, which for the next two decades feature gatherings of leading conservative political, media and intellectual figures. In 2005 Horowitz created the website,DiscoverTheNetworks.org, an online encyclopedia of the political left, which has influenced the works of a generation of conservative journalists and authors.
With the support of the Center, Horowitz continued his writing about the nature and consequences of radical politics, writing more than a dozen books, including The Politics of Bad Faith (2000), Hating Whitey & Other Progressive Causes (2000), Left Illusions (2003), and The Party of Defeat (2008). His Art of Political War (2000) was described by Bush White House political strategist Karl Rove as “the perfect guide to winning on the political battlefield.” In 2004 he published Unholy Alliance, which was the first book about the tacit alliance between Islamo-fascists in the Middle East and secular radicals in the west.
Horowitz has devoted much of his attention over the past several years to the radicalization of the American university. In 2001 he conducted a national campaign on American campuses to oppose reparations for slavery 137 years after the fact as divisive and racist, since the since there were no longer any living slaves and reparations were to be paid and received on the basis of skin color). His book Uncivil Wars (2001) describes the campaign and was the first in a series of five books he would write about the state of higher education.
In 2003, he launched an academic freedom campaign to return the American university to traditional principles of open inquiry and to halt indoctrination in the classroom. To further these goals he devised an Academic Bill of Rights to ensure students access to more than one side of controversial issues and to protect their academic freedom. In 2006, Horowitz published The Professors (2006), a study of the political abuse of college classrooms. Indoctrination U., which followed in 2008, documented the controversies this book and his campaign had created. In 2009, he co-authored One Party Classroom with Jacob Laksin, a study of more than 150 college curricula designed as courses of indoctrination. In 2010, he published Reforming Our Universities, providing a detailed account of the entire campaign.
Along with these titles Horowitz wrote two philosophical meditations/memoirs on mortality, The End of Time (2005) and A Point in Time (2011), which summed up the themes of his life. A Cracking of the Heart (2009) is a poignant memoir of his daughter Sarah which explores these themes as well.
Many have commented on the lyrical style of these memoirs. The literary critic Stanley Fish, a political liberal, has described The End of Time as “Beautifully written, unflinching in its contemplation of the abyss, and yet finally hopeful in its acceptance of human finitude.”
In 2013 Horowitz began publishing a ten volume series of his collected journalistic writings and essays under the general title The Black Book of The American Left. The first volume, My Life & Times, was published in 2013; the second, Progressives, in 2014. The Black Book is filled with character and event—with profiles of radicals he knew (ranging from Huey Newton to Billy Ayers), analysis of the nature of progressivism, and running accounts of his efforts to oppose it. When completed, The Black Book will be a unique chronicle of the political wars between left and right as seen by an observer who has made a significant impact on both sides of the during his political and literary careers.
Cultural critic Camille Paglia has said of David Horowitz: “I respect the astute and rigorously unsentimental David Horowitz as one of America’s most original and courageous political analysts. . . . I think that, a century from now, cultural historians will find David Horowitz’s spiritual and political odyssey paradigmatic for our time.”
Norman Podhoretz, former editor of Commentary magazine, says of Horowitz: “David Horowitz is hated by the Left because he is not only an apostate but has been even more relentless and aggressive in attacking his former political allies than some of us who preceded him in what I once called ‘breaking ranks’ with that world. He has also taken the polemical and organizational techniques he learned in his days on the left, and figured out how to use them against the Left, whose vulnerabilities he knows in his bones.”
A full bibliography of Horowitz’s writings is available at: http://www.frontpagemag.com/bibliography
从语言的层面来看,这本书简直是一场词汇的盛宴,但这种华丽绝非空洞的辞藻堆砌,而是服务于其内在的荒诞主题。作者对拉丁语和古老哲学术语的娴熟运用,给文本增添了一种既古典又超现实的质感。读起来就像是在阅读一本被精心装订的、却记录着荒谬梦境的古籍。我注意到作者经常使用非常长的、结构复杂的句子,这些句子本身就像是蜿蜒的河流,带着各种支流和回旋,挑战着阅读的流畅性,但也极大地增强了描述的深度和层次感。它有一种对既定文学规范的公然反叛,拒绝被简单的标签所定义。那些关于“意义”的探索,不是通过说教式的议论来实现的,而是通过构建一个充满象征符号的、近乎巴洛克式的场景来实现的。例如,书中反复出现的关于“镜子”和“倒影”的意象,与其说是具体的物件,不如说是一种形而上的隐喻,指向我们对真实性的不懈追问。每一次重新阅读,我都能从那些看似繁复的句法结构中捕捉到新的纹理和隐藏的含义,这本书的文本密度极高,值得反复咀嚼。
评分这部作品的配乐感极强,虽然是文字,但阅读时脑海中总会响起一些不和谐的、但又莫名和谐的音符。作者似乎对人与“空间”的关系有着独特的见解,书中描绘的许多场景,无论是空旷的广场还是拥挤的房间,都散发出一种强烈的压迫感或抽离感。空间不再是事件发生的背景,它本身就是行动的主体和参与者,影响着人物的心理轨迹。我非常欣赏它对“沉默”的运用,那些大段的空白和未被填补的叙事空间,其力量远大于任何激烈的冲突场面。这些留白如同深海中的暗流,虽然看不见,却蕴含着巨大的能量,推动着读者的潜意识去填补那些缺失的情感重量。它不像是在读一个故事,更像是在参与一场私人化的、略带仪式感的冥想活动。看完之后,我感到一种奇异的平静,但这种平静并非源于满足,而是源于彻底的耗竭——仿佛所有感官都被调动到了极限,然后又被轻轻地放回原位。这本书迫使你直面那些不适,并从中寻找一种独特的、属于自己的“美感”。
评分这本作品的结构处理得极为精巧,它拒绝提供传统的线性叙事,而是采用了碎片化的、多重视角的拼贴手法。每一章似乎都是一个独立的微观世界,但当你将它们并置在一起时,一个宏大而模糊的图景便开始浮现。我感觉作者在玩弄时间与记忆的把戏,过去的回响不断地干扰着当下的行动,使得“现在”这个概念变得极其脆弱。叙事声音的转换非常大胆,有时是近乎冷酷的客观记录,有时又切换到一种极度主观、充满诗意和哲思的独白。这种不稳定的视角迫使读者必须积极地参与到意义的构建中,去填补那些刻意留下的空白。书中对“身份”的探讨也极其深刻,角色们似乎都在不断地进行自我解构和重塑,他们与自己曾经的信念、与他人建立的联系,都像是沙堡一样,随时可能被下一次浪潮冲刷殆尽。我对其中关于“遗忘”的描绘印象尤其深刻,它不是简单的记忆缺失,而是一种主动的、带有仪式感的自我清除,这让故事带上了一层悲剧性的宿命感。总的来说,这不是一本轻松的书,它要求读者付出极大的耐心和智力投入,但回报是丰厚的——你会获得对叙事本质更深层次的理解。
评分这本书最引人注目的一点,是它对“时间流逝”的描绘方式,完全颠覆了我对传统叙事的认知。它更像是一种音乐作品,而非传统意义上的小说。有些段落节奏缓慢得如同慢板,每一个动作、每一个呼吸都被无限拉长,仿佛时间本身凝固了;而另一些关键时刻,却被压缩成一瞬即逝的闪光,几乎没有给予读者反应的时间。这种非线性的、情绪驱动的节奏感,成功地模拟了人类记忆和意识的运作方式——连贯的表象之下,充满了跳跃和断裂。书中对“等待”这个主题的探讨尤其到位,角色们似乎永远处于一种悬而未决的状态,他们的生命似乎就是一场永无止境的序幕。这种氛围营造得非常成功,让人感到一种深刻的、形而上的焦灼。我几乎可以感觉到那种在无尽的虚空中漂浮、找不到着力点的无助感,这可能也是作者想要传达的核心体验。它毫不留情地揭示了我们在日常生活中为了对抗虚无所做的种种徒劳的努力。
评分这本书的整体氛围有一种挥之不去的疏离感,让人在阅读过程中不断地审视自我与周遭环境的关系。作者似乎很擅长捕捉那些潜藏在日常生活表象之下的微妙不安,那些我们习惯性地视而不见的裂痕。比如,书中对城市中光影变幻的细腻描摹,不仅仅是风景的记录,更像是一种心境的投射。主角的行为模式常常令人费解,他们似乎总是在追逐一些虚无缥缈的目标,或者是在逃避某种心照不宣的真相。这种不确定性使得情节的推进带有一种梦游般的质感,你很难确切地说出故事的“重点”在哪里,更多的是一种情绪的累积。我尤其欣赏作者在人物对话中埋下的潜台词,那些没有说出口的话语,往往比直接的陈述更具冲击力,它们像冰块一样,在字里行间悄无声息地融化,留下清冷的余韵。阅读体验更像是在迷宫中行走,你明知出口存在,却必须沉浸于那些不断重复、变换的路径中才能有所体会。书的节奏把握得非常老道,时而缓慢得让人近乎窒息,时而又在不经意间猛地加速,将你抛入一个意料之外的场景,这种张弛有度让人欲罢不能,同时也让人在合上书页后,仍然习惯性地去寻找那些缺失的、被省略的叙事环节。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有