This book focuses on the historical configuration of the territorial borders and functional boundaries of the European nation state. It presents integration as a process of boundary transcendence, redefinition, shift, and change that fundamentally alters the nature of the European states. Its core concern lies in the relationship between the specific institutional design of the new Brussels centre, the boundary redefinitions that result from its political production, and, finally, the consequences of these two elements on established and developing national European political structures. Integration is examined as a new historical phase in the development of Europe, characterized by a powerful trend toward legal, economic, and cultural de-differentiation after the five-century process of differentiation that led to the European system of nation states. Considering the EU as the formation of an enlarged territorial system, this work recovers some of the classic issues of political modernization theory: Is the EU an attempt at state formation? Is it an attempt at centre formation without nation building? Is it a process of centre formation without democratization? This work also seeks to sharpen the conceptual tools currently available to deal with processes of territorial enlargement and unification. It develops a theoretical framework for political structuring beyond the nation state, capable of linking all aspects of EU integration (inter-governmentalism, definition of rights, the 'constitutionalization' of treaties, the tensions between the new territorial hierarchy and the nation states, etc.). The book adopts an 'holistic' approach to integration, in the form of a theory from which hypotheses can be generated (even if it is not possible to test all of its components). This theoretical framework has three principal aims: to overcome a rigid distinction between domestic politics and international relations; to link actors' orientations, interests, and motivations with macro outcomes; and to relate structural profiles with dynamic processes of change.
评分
评分
评分
评分
“Restructuring Europe”这个书名立即引起了我对欧洲大陆未来走向的强烈关注。我一直认为,欧洲作为一个历史悠久且文化多元的大陆,其每一次的变革都对世界格局产生着重要影响。我希望这本书能够提供一个广阔的视角,去审视当前欧洲所面临的复杂挑战,并探讨它如何应对这些挑战,实现自身的重塑。我尤其感兴趣的是,书中是否会深入分析一些关键的议题,例如欧洲的经济复苏战略,它在科技创新领域的竞争力,以及它在能源转型和气候变化方面的努力。我也想知道,这本书是否会探讨欧洲在价值观和身份认同上的演变,以及它如何在全球舞台上塑造自己的形象。我期待这本书能够为我提供一些关于欧洲未来发展方向的深刻见解,它是否会更加倾向于一个更加联邦化的欧洲,还是会更加重视成员国之间的合作?这本书的题目预示着一场重要的变革,我希望从中能够找到理解这场变革的脉络,并对欧洲的未来发展前景有更清晰的认识。
评分读到“Restructuring Europe”这个书名,我的思绪立刻就飘到了那些关于欧洲一体化进程中的争论。我一直对欧洲的政治版图和权力结构有着浓厚的兴趣,尤其是它如何从民族国家的集合体,逐步演变成一个更紧密的经济和政治联盟。我希望这本书能够深入分析这个过程的内在逻辑和外部压力。例如,欧盟的扩张和深化是否带来了意想不到的后果?在应对全球性挑战时,欧洲是否真正展现出了作为一个整体的力量?我特别好奇的是,书中是否会探讨一些非传统的力量,比如非政府组织、公民社会以及科技巨头,它们在重塑欧洲的过程中扮演着怎样的角色?我期待它能提供一些案例研究,展示不同国家和地区是如何在新的欧洲框架下,调整自身的发展战略和政策。并且,我希望能从中读到一些关于欧洲未来发展方向的深入讨论,它是否会更加侧重于经济的竞争力,还是会更加关注社会公平和环境的可持续性?这本书的题目暗示着一场深刻的变革,我渴望了解这场变革的动力、过程以及潜在的结局。
评分在翻开这本书之前,我脑海中已经勾勒出了一幅关于欧洲未来的蓝图。我一直认为,欧洲作为一个多元化的联合体,其核心吸引力在于它对民主、人权和多边主义的承诺。然而,现实世界中的挑战却如此严峻,从地缘政治的紧张,到经济发展的不平衡,再到内部社会价值观的碰撞,都让“重塑欧洲”这个命题显得尤为紧迫和复杂。我希望这本书能够提供一个跳出传统视角的机会,去审视那些可能被主流叙事所忽略的驱动力。比如,那些在地方层面悄然发生的社会运动,或者是一些新兴的科技创新对欧洲社会结构带来的颠覆性影响。我更关注的是,这本书是否能够探讨欧洲如何在保留其独特文化多样性的同时,实现更深层次的整合?它是否会深入分析一些关键的历史事件,比如柏林墙的倒塌,或者欧元区的成立,是如何塑造了当今欧洲的格局?我期待它能提供一些批判性的思考,质疑那些看起来理所当然的“欧洲模式”,并提出新的发展方向。对我而言,这本书不应仅仅是对现状的描述,更应是对未来的一种探索和预见。
评分这本书,我对它的期望很高,因为“Restructuring Europe”这个题目实在太吸引人了。我一直对欧洲的未来充满了好奇,尤其是它如何从过去的历史中汲取教训,又如何应对当前全球化的挑战,构建新的秩序。我常常在想,在经历了两次世界大战的创伤,冷战的分裂,以及后来的经济一体化浪潮之后,欧洲是否真的能够找到一条可持续发展的道路?这本书的书名给我的第一印象就是它能够深入探讨欧洲大陆上发生的深刻变革,从政治、经济到社会文化的各个层面。我特别期待它能剖析欧盟内部日益复杂的权力动态,以及成员国之间在国家利益和集体目标之间的博弈。再加上一些关于欧洲在全球舞台上扮演的角色,它如何与美国、中国等大国互动,以及它在应对气候变化、移民危机等跨国问题上的能力。我想象中的这本书,应该会像一位经验丰富的历史学家,同时又具备敏锐的洞察力,能够将宏大的历史叙事与具体的政策分析相结合,为读者描绘出一幅清晰而深刻的欧洲重塑图景。我希望它能提供一些有力的论据,解释欧洲为何选择现在的道路,以及这条道路的潜在风险和机遇。
评分当我看到“Restructuring Europe”这个书名时,我的第一反应是它会深入探讨欧洲大陆在后冷战时代所经历的巨大转变。我一直对欧洲的政治经济一体化进程充满好奇,尤其是欧盟这个庞大而复杂的组织是如何运作的。我希望这本书能够揭示驱动这些变革的核心力量,以及它们对欧洲各国社会、经济和文化产生的深远影响。我特别关注的是,书中是否会深入分析一些关键的转型时期,例如东欧国家的民主化进程,或者欧元区危机如何重塑了欧洲的经济格局。我期待这本书能提供一些关于欧洲未来发展方向的独到见解,它是否会更加强调国家主权,还是会进一步深化一体化?我希望它能探讨欧洲在全球化浪潮中如何保持其独特性,同时又能应对来自其他大国的竞争和挑战。这本书的题目本身就蕴含着一种动荡和重塑的力量,我渴望从中找到理解这场变革的钥匙,并对欧洲的未来发展趋势有更清晰的认识。
评分structuralist, theore-frame built on Rokkan's and Hirschman's exit-voice-loyalty. boundary-system building-political structuring. state-formation attempt, center formation; loyalty, system building, weak, imbalance with political production; without institutionalization of conflict lines, and how they relate to national conflict lines, dangerous.
评分structuralist, theore-frame built on Rokkan's and Hirschman's exit-voice-loyalty. boundary-system building-political structuring. state-formation attempt, center formation; loyalty, system building, weak, imbalance with political production; without institutionalization of conflict lines, and how they relate to national conflict lines, dangerous.
评分structuralist, theore-frame built on Rokkan's and Hirschman's exit-voice-loyalty. boundary-system building-political structuring. state-formation attempt, center formation; loyalty, system building, weak, imbalance with political production; without institutionalization of conflict lines, and how they relate to national conflict lines, dangerous.
评分structuralist, theore-frame built on Rokkan's and Hirschman's exit-voice-loyalty. boundary-system building-political structuring. state-formation attempt, center formation; loyalty, system building, weak, imbalance with political production; without institutionalization of conflict lines, and how they relate to national conflict lines, dangerous.
评分structuralist, theore-frame built on Rokkan's and Hirschman's exit-voice-loyalty. boundary-system building-political structuring. state-formation attempt, center formation; loyalty, system building, weak, imbalance with political production; without institutionalization of conflict lines, and how they relate to national conflict lines, dangerous.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有