This provocative volume deals with one of the chief criticisms of ethnographic studies, a criticism which centres on their particularism or their insistence on context -- the question is asked: How can these studies be generalized beyond the individual case? Noblit and Hare propose a method -- meta-ethnography -- for synthesizing from qualitative, interpretive studies. They show that ethnographies themselves are interpretive acts, and demonstrate that by translating metaphors and key concepts between ethnographic studies, it is possible to develop a broader interpretive synthesis. Using examples from numerous studies, the authors illuminate how meta-ethnography works, isolate several types of meta-ethnographic study and provide a theoretical justification for the method's use.
定性研究合成的开山之作吧,介绍了reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三种研究结果的synthesis
评分定性研究合成的开山之作吧,介绍了reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三种研究结果的synthesis
评分定性研究合成的开山之作吧,介绍了reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三种研究结果的synthesis
评分定性研究合成的开山之作吧,介绍了reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三种研究结果的synthesis
评分定性研究合成的开山之作吧,介绍了reciprocal, refutational, and line-of-argument三种研究结果的synthesis
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有