Decisive biotechnological interventions in the lottery of human life - to enhance our bodies and brains and perhaps irreversibly change our genetic makeup - have been widely rejected as unethical and undesirable, and have often met with extreme hostility. But in "Enhancing Evolution", leading bioethicist John Harris dismantles objections to genetic engineering, stem-cell research, designer babies, and cloning to make a forthright, sweeping, and rigorous ethical case for using biotechnology to improve human life. Human enhancement, Harris argues, is a good thing - good morally, good for individuals, good as social policy, and good for a genetic heritage that needs serious improvement."Enhancing Evolution" defends biotechnological interventions that could allow us to live longer, healthier, and even happier lives by, for example, providing us with immunity from cancer and HIV/AIDS. But the book advocates far more than therapies designed to free us from sickness and disability. Harris champions the possibility of influencing the very course of evolution to give us increased mental and physical powers - from reasoning, concentration, and memory to strength, stamina, and reaction speed. Indeed, he supports enhancing ourselves in almost any way we desire. And it's not only morally defensible to enhance ourselves, Harris says. In some cases, it's morally obligatory. Whether one looks upon biotechnology with hope, fear, or a little of both, "Enhancing Evolution" makes a case for it that no one can ignore.
發表於2024-11-13
Enhancing Evolution 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 科普
基本思路:Reproductive right/liberty是一項基本人權,其內涵是隨著時代變化在不斷拓寬的,所以新技術也應該包括進來。對於未來人類不僅僅隻看主體的 autonomy interests。Sandel,Kass, Habermas都不對,或是過分保守隻一味強調技術的風險、人類有限性之珍貴,或是沒有明確區分一些概念而匆忙下瞭定斷。當然,作者有一個默認前提,那就是他所積極支持、鼓勵大傢擁抱的,肯定是那些可靠的技術。
評分基本思路:Reproductive right/liberty是一項基本人權,其內涵是隨著時代變化在不斷拓寬的,所以新技術也應該包括進來。對於未來人類不僅僅隻看主體的 autonomy interests。Sandel,Kass, Habermas都不對,或是過分保守隻一味強調技術的風險、人類有限性之珍貴,或是沒有明確區分一些概念而匆忙下瞭定斷。當然,作者有一個默認前提,那就是他所積極支持、鼓勵大傢擁抱的,肯定是那些可靠的技術。
評分基本思路:Reproductive right/liberty是一項基本人權,其內涵是隨著時代變化在不斷拓寬的,所以新技術也應該包括進來。對於未來人類不僅僅隻看主體的 autonomy interests。Sandel,Kass, Habermas都不對,或是過分保守隻一味強調技術的風險、人類有限性之珍貴,或是沒有明確區分一些概念而匆忙下瞭定斷。當然,作者有一個默認前提,那就是他所積極支持、鼓勵大傢擁抱的,肯定是那些可靠的技術。
評分基本思路:Reproductive right/liberty是一項基本人權,其內涵是隨著時代變化在不斷拓寬的,所以新技術也應該包括進來。對於未來人類不僅僅隻看主體的 autonomy interests。Sandel,Kass, Habermas都不對,或是過分保守隻一味強調技術的風險、人類有限性之珍貴,或是沒有明確區分一些概念而匆忙下瞭定斷。當然,作者有一個默認前提,那就是他所積極支持、鼓勵大傢擁抱的,肯定是那些可靠的技術。
評分基本思路:Reproductive right/liberty是一項基本人權,其內涵是隨著時代變化在不斷拓寬的,所以新技術也應該包括進來。對於未來人類不僅僅隻看主體的 autonomy interests。Sandel,Kass, Habermas都不對,或是過分保守隻一味強調技術的風險、人類有限性之珍貴,或是沒有明確區分一些概念而匆忙下瞭定斷。當然,作者有一個默認前提,那就是他所積極支持、鼓勵大傢擁抱的,肯定是那些可靠的技術。
Enhancing Evolution 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載