Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

Summer for the Gods 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-05-16

Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 Summer for the Gods 电子书的读者还喜欢

Summer for the Gods 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Basic Books

作者:Edward J. Larson

出品人:

页数:336

译者:

出版时间:2006-10-2

价格:USD 16.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780465075102

丛书系列:

图书标签: 进化论神创论猴子审判普利策奖威廉·詹宁斯·布赖斯克拉伦斯·丹诺世界历史 HistoryOfScience

Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

Reissued with a new preface: the Pulitzer Prize-winning book that is "quite simply the best book ever written on the Scopes Trial and its place in American history and myth." In the summer of 1925, the sleepy hamlet of Dayton, Tennessee, became the setting for one of the 20th century's most contentious dramas: the Scopes trial that pit William Jennings Bryan and the anti-Darwinists against a teacher named John Scopes into a famous debate over science, religion, and their place in public education. That trial marked the start of a battle that continues to this day--in Dover, Pennsylvania, Kansas, Cobb County, Georgia, and many other cities and states throughout the country. Edward Larson's classic, Summer for the Gods , received the Pulitzer Prize in History in 1998 and is the single most authoritative account of a pivotal event whose combatants remain at odds in school districts and courtrooms. For this edition, Larson has added a new preface that assesses the state of the battle between creationism and evolution, and points the way to how it might potentially be resolved.

Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Summer for the Gods 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样，基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid，但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实，而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了，最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论：用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

评分☆☆☆☆☆