I. Bernard Cohen was Victor S. Thomas Professor of the History of Science, Emeritus, at Harvard University, and one of the founders of the modern study of the history of science.
Only a scholar as rich in learning as I. Bernard Cohen could do justice to a theme so subtle and yet so grand. Spanning five centuries and virtually all of scientific endeavor, "Revolution in Science" traces the nuances that differentiate both scientific revolutions and human perceptions of them, weaving threads of detail from physics, mathematics, behaviorism, Freud, atomic physics, and even plate tectonics and molecular biology, into the larger fabric of intellectual history. How did "revolution," a term from the physical sciences, meaning a turning again and implying permanence and recurrence--the cyclical succession of the seasons, the 'revolutions' of the planets in their orbits--become transformed into an expression for radical change in political and socioeconomic affairs, then become appropriated once again to the sciences? How have political revolutions--French, American, Bolshevik--and such intellectual forces as Darwinism further modified the concept, from revolution in science as a dramatic break with the past to the idea that science progresses by the slow accumulation of knowledge? And what does each transformation in each historical period tell us about the deep conceptual changes in our image of the scientist and scientific activity? Cohen's exploration seeks to uncover nothing less than the nature of all scientific revolutions, the stages by which they occur, their time scale, specific criteria for determining whether or not there has been a revolution, and the creative factors in producing a revolutionary new idea. His book is a probing analysis of the history of an idea and one of the most impressive surveys of the history of science ever undertaken.
發表於2024-12-05
Revolution in Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
評分【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
評分在孔夫子網上書店買瞭《科學中的革命》的英文原版書籍,而且還是hard copy。我一直覺得,看外國人寫的文學作品和學術專著,必須看原版!中文翻譯版韆萬不能相信,隻能通過速讀的方式快速瞭解書中主旨,絕對不能采用研讀的方式推敲每一句背後的作者觀點。當然,商務印書館除外,...
評分在國內外科學哲學界一緻認為科學革命是推動科學發展的動力,美國科學哲學傢科恩在 《科學中的革命》一書中對科學革命進行瞭深入的研究,科恩提齣科學革命有四個檢驗標準[1]①,經曆四個階段[2]②。以下的科學傢認為自己的工作是革命性的或是科學革命的一部分, “羅伯特·...
評分【摘要】科學革命的重要特徵是信仰上的改變。信仰改變跟“經驗“與“體驗”的比較密切相關。關注信仰改變,對科學革命、科學發展具有重要意義。堅定性與轉換性相結閤、現實性與超越性相結閤,是具有科學價值的信仰改變的重要朝嚮。 繼托馬斯庫恩(ThomasS.Kuhn)的《科學革命的結構...
圖書標籤: 科學 科學史 曆史 STS
這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
評分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
評分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
評分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
評分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
Revolution in Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載