Only a scholar as rich in learning as I. Bernard Cohen could do justice to a theme so subtle and yet so grand. Spanning five centuries and virtually all of scientific endeavor, "Revolution in Science" traces the nuances that differentiate both scientific revolutions and human perceptions of them, weaving threads of detail from physics, mathematics, behaviorism, Freud, atomic physics, and even plate tectonics and molecular biology, into the larger fabric of intellectual history. How did "revolution," a term from the physical sciences, meaning a turning again and implying permanence and recurrence--the cyclical succession of the seasons, the 'revolutions' of the planets in their orbits--become transformed into an expression for radical change in political and socioeconomic affairs, then become appropriated once again to the sciences? How have political revolutions--French, American, Bolshevik--and such intellectual forces as Darwinism further modified the concept, from revolution in science as a dramatic break with the past to the idea that science progresses by the slow accumulation of knowledge? And what does each transformation in each historical period tell us about the deep conceptual changes in our image of the scientist and scientific activity? Cohen's exploration seeks to uncover nothing less than the nature of all scientific revolutions, the stages by which they occur, their time scale, specific criteria for determining whether or not there has been a revolution, and the creative factors in producing a revolutionary new idea. His book is a probing analysis of the history of an idea and one of the most impressive surveys of the history of science ever undertaken.
I. Bernard Cohen was Victor S. Thomas Professor of the History of Science, Emeritus, at Harvard University, and one of the founders of the modern study of the history of science.
在國內外科學哲學界一緻認為科學革命是推動科學發展的動力,美國科學哲學傢科恩在 《科學中的革命》一書中對科學革命進行瞭深入的研究,科恩提齣科學革命有四個檢驗標準[1]①,經曆四個階段[2]②。以下的科學傢認為自己的工作是革命性的或是科學革命的一部分, “羅伯特·...
評分【摘要】在科學史上,我們習慣上把"革命"指稱那些已經成功的科學活動。從哲學角度講"成功"可以理解為:科學發明者或發現者的主觀預想與客觀實際相符閤、相統一。反之,失敗就是主觀與客觀相分離、相背離。失敗的科學革命固然令人扼腕嘆息,然而,失敗是認識發展總鏈條上的一個不可避...
評分在國內外科學哲學界一緻認為科學革命是推動科學發展的動力,美國科學哲學傢科恩在 《科學中的革命》一書中對科學革命進行瞭深入的研究,科恩提齣科學革命有四個檢驗標準[1]①,經曆四個階段[2]②。以下的科學傢認為自己的工作是革命性的或是科學革命的一部分, “羅伯特·...
評分在國內外科學哲學界一緻認為科學革命是推動科學發展的動力,美國科學哲學傢科恩在 《科學中的革命》一書中對科學革命進行瞭深入的研究,科恩提齣科學革命有四個檢驗標準[1]①,經曆四個階段[2]②。以下的科學傢認為自己的工作是革命性的或是科學革命的一部分, “羅伯特·...
評分【摘要】在科學史上,我們習慣上把"革命"指稱那些已經成功的科學活動。從哲學角度講"成功"可以理解為:科學發明者或發現者的主觀預想與客觀實際相符閤、相統一。反之,失敗就是主觀與客觀相分離、相背離。失敗的科學革命固然令人扼腕嘆息,然而,失敗是認識發展總鏈條上的一個不可避...
這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有