I. Bernard Cohen was Victor S. Thomas Professor of the History of Science, Emeritus, at Harvard University, and one of the founders of the modern study of the history of science.
Only a scholar as rich in learning as I. Bernard Cohen could do justice to a theme so subtle and yet so grand. Spanning five centuries and virtually all of scientific endeavor, "Revolution in Science" traces the nuances that differentiate both scientific revolutions and human perceptions of them, weaving threads of detail from physics, mathematics, behaviorism, Freud, atomic physics, and even plate tectonics and molecular biology, into the larger fabric of intellectual history. How did "revolution," a term from the physical sciences, meaning a turning again and implying permanence and recurrence--the cyclical succession of the seasons, the 'revolutions' of the planets in their orbits--become transformed into an expression for radical change in political and socioeconomic affairs, then become appropriated once again to the sciences? How have political revolutions--French, American, Bolshevik--and such intellectual forces as Darwinism further modified the concept, from revolution in science as a dramatic break with the past to the idea that science progresses by the slow accumulation of knowledge? And what does each transformation in each historical period tell us about the deep conceptual changes in our image of the scientist and scientific activity? Cohen's exploration seeks to uncover nothing less than the nature of all scientific revolutions, the stages by which they occur, their time scale, specific criteria for determining whether or not there has been a revolution, and the creative factors in producing a revolutionary new idea. His book is a probing analysis of the history of an idea and one of the most impressive surveys of the history of science ever undertaken.
【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
評分【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
評分在孔夫子網上書店買瞭《科學中的革命》的英文原版書籍,而且還是hard copy。我一直覺得,看外國人寫的文學作品和學術專著,必須看原版!中文翻譯版韆萬不能相信,隻能通過速讀的方式快速瞭解書中主旨,絕對不能采用研讀的方式推敲每一句背後的作者觀點。當然,商務印書館除外,...
評分【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
評分【摘要】科恩與庫恩都對哥白尼進行瞭研究,但對於是否存在哥白尼革命持相互對立的觀點。這種對立在於兩人對哥白尼革命的界定、評價標準以及兩人對科學史分析方式和研究目標上的差異。科恩不承認哥白尼革命的存在,因為它不能通過曆史的實證,庫恩眼中的哥白尼革命則是他運用其曆史...
這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
评分這本書對“革命”(不僅僅是“科學革命”)這個詞語的語源研究,非常值得一看…
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有