Formations of Colonial Modernity in East Asia

Contributors. Charles K. Armstrong, Tani E. Barlow, Fred Y. L. Chiu, Chungmoo Choi, Alan S. Christy, Craig Clunas, James A. Fujii, James L. Hevia, Charles Shiro Inouye, Lydia H. Liu, Miriam Silverberg, Tomiyama Ichiro, Wang Hui

出版者:Duke University Press

作者:Tani E. Barlow (Editor)

页数:464

出版时间:1997-3-18

价格:USD 28.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780822319436

图书标签:modernity英文版APS-60116

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

The essays in Formations of Colonial Modernity in East Asia challenge the idea that notions of modernity and colonialism are mere imports from the West, and show how colonial modernity has evolved from and into unique forms throughout Asia. Although the modernity of non-European colonies is as indisputable as the colonial core of European modernity, until recently East Asian scholarship has tried to view Asian colonialism through the paradigm of colonial India (for instance), failing to recognize anti-imperialist nationalist impulses within differing Asian countries and regions.

Demonstrating an impatience with social science models of knowledge, the contributors show that binary categories focused on during the Cold War are no longer central to the project of history writing. By bringing together articles previously published in the journal positions: east asia cultures critique, editor Tani Barlow has demonstrated how scholars construct identity and history, providing cultural critics with new ways to think about these concepts—in the context of Asia and beyond.

Chapters address topics such as the making of imperial subjects in Okinawa, politics and the body social in colonial Hong Kong, and the discourse of decolonization and popular memory in South Korea. This is an invaluable collection for students and scholars of Asian studies, postcolonial studies, and anthropology.

用户评价

不是很习惯Barlow的写作风格啊，读完感觉完全没读懂。读艺术史的时候不是西方就是超级古代的东方，Colonialism/Postcolonialism这块基本没怎么接触过，还需要好好补补TAT。明天discussion和老师多讨论一下！

不是很习惯Barlow的写作风格啊，读完感觉完全没读懂。读艺术史的时候不是西方就是超级古代的东方，Colonialism/Postcolonialism这块基本没怎么接触过，还需要好好补补TAT。明天discussion和老师多讨论一下！

不是很习惯Barlow的写作风格啊，读完感觉完全没读懂。读艺术史的时候不是西方就是超级古代的东方，Colonialism/Postcolonialism这块基本没怎么接触过，还需要好好补补TAT。明天discussion和老师多讨论一下！

不是很习惯Barlow的写作风格啊，读完感觉完全没读懂。读艺术史的时候不是西方就是超级古代的东方，Colonialism/Postcolonialism这块基本没怎么接触过，还需要好好补补TAT。明天discussion和老师多讨论一下！

不是很习惯Barlow的写作风格啊，读完感觉完全没读懂。读艺术史的时候不是西方就是超级古代的东方，Colonialism/Postcolonialism这块基本没怎么接触过，还需要好好补补TAT。明天discussion和老师多讨论一下！