Matthew d'Ancona is a British journalist and broadcaster. He writes a weekly column for the Guardian and was previously editor of the Spectator. He also contributes regularly to the BBC's Today program. Matthew was the Sunday Telegraph's political columnist for 19 years. He also writes for the Evening Standard, the New York Times and GQ. Matthew is a visiting research fellow at Queen Mary University of London and author of several books including In It Together: The Inside Story of the Coalition.
He is a Trustee of the Science Museum Group, chair of the think-tank Bright Blue and was elected a Prize Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, in 1989.
Welcome to the Post Truth era?a time in which the art of the lie is shaking the very foundations of democracy and the world as we know it. The Brexit vote; Donald Trump’s victory; the rejection of climate change science; the vilification of immigrants; all have been based on the power to evoke feelings and not facts. So what does it all mean and how can we champion truth in in a time of lies and "alternative facts?" In this eye-opening and timely book, Post Truth is distinguished from a long tradition of political lies, exaggeration and spin. What is new is not the mendacity of politicians but the public’s response to it and the ability of new technologies and social media to manipulate, polarise and entrench opinion. Where trust has evaporated, conspiracy theories thrive, the authority of the media wilt and emotions matter more than facts . Now, one of the UK’s most respected political journalists, Matthew d’Ancona investigates how we got here, why quiet resignation is not an option and how we can and must fight back.
發表於2024-11-23
Post-Truth 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛? Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重...
評分“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛? Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重...
評分“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛? Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重...
評分“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛? Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重...
評分“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛? Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重...
圖書標籤: 政治 posttruth information
在post-truth時代,缺乏事實支撐的觀點比起事實本身更受到追捧。在有瞭更多信息渠道的同時,偏見也得到瞭更廣泛的傳播。對於過往重大新聞和曆史節點的迴顧給瞭非常詳實的描述和解析。最後一章也有不少具有建設性的建議。
評分too biased
評分“Post-truth”藉鑒“Postmorden”的翻譯 中翻是“後真相”嘛?Post-truth時代的兩大特徵大抵是:1.當辨彆事情的可信度時 “真相“對人情感上的“感化作用”勝過瞭客觀證據的說服力 2.“post-truth”的作用在於製造懷疑 而非確定真相本身 導緻的危害大概有:1.真相本身不再重要 2.成為一種操縱手段 3.社會趨於非理性 損害法治 不曉得作者提到的“anti-democratic”和目前西方社會擔心的民粹主義有關聯否 我進而想到瞭價值的去中心化(造的短語 隨便說說罷瞭)私以為作者的確對社會現象的解釋有些too biased 譬如有種感覺是作者在用力懟川普吧哈哈哈 但還是值得一讀 後麵給的fight back的戰略也很有意思 最尾很熱血瞭【寫不下的寫書評裏吧 頭大】
評分too biased
評分It's interesting that for D'Ancona, diversity appeals to nativism; identity with common ground captures internationalism. Some way-out noted: facing incommensurable realities with doublethink, realism anew oriented by object's resistance and affordance, forensic investigation by statistical accumulation, and charging the sensibility from EQ.
Post-Truth 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載