Archie Brown is a British political scientist and historian. He is Emeritus Professor of Politics at Oxford University and Emeritus Fel low of St Antony's College, Oxford. A Fellow of the British Academy since 1991, Professor Brown was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2003. He has written widely on Soviet and Communist politics, the Cold War, and political leadership.
All too frequently, leadership is reduced to a simple dichotomy: the strong versus the weak. Yet, there are myriad ways to exercise effective political leadershipas well as different ways to fail. We blame our leaders for economic downfalls and praise them for vital social reforms, but rarely do we question what makes some leaders successful while others falter. In this magisterial and wide-ranging survey of political leadership over the past hundred years, renowned Oxford politics professor Archie Brown challenges the widespread belief that strong leaders meaning those who dominate their colleagues and the policy-making process are the most successful and admirable.
In reality, only a minority of political leaders will truly make a lasting difference. Though we tend to dismiss more collegial styles of leadership as weak, it is often the most cooperative leaders who have the greatest impact. Drawing on extensive research and decades of political analysis and experience, Brown illuminates the achievements, failures and foibles of a broad array of twentieth century politicians. Whether speaking of redefining leaders like Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Margaret Thatcher, who expanded the limits of what was politically possible during their time in power, or the even rarer transformational leaders who played a decisive role in bringing about systemic change Charles de Gaulle, Mikhail Gorbachev and Nelson Mandela, among them Brown challenges our commonly held beliefs about political efficacy and strength.
Overturning many of our assumptions about the twentieth century’s most important figures, Brown’s conclusions are both original and enlightening. The Myth of the Strong Leader compels us to reassess the leaders who have shaped our world and to reconsider how we should choose and evaluate those who will lead us into the future.
發表於2025-01-14
The Myth of the Strong Leader 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
卡裏斯瑪(charisma)並不是馬剋斯·韋伯(Max Weber)發明的,但被他用作宗教社會學和政治社會學的概念工具之後,成為學者和大眾媒體都廣泛使用的詞匯。首先是1920年代在德國被用來分析崛起於意大利的法西斯領導人墨索裏尼,其次是1930年代在歐洲(包括納粹德國)和美國被用來...
評分卡裏斯瑪(charisma)並不是馬剋斯·韋伯(Max Weber)發明的,但被他用作宗教社會學和政治社會學的概念工具之後,成為學者和大眾媒體都廣泛使用的詞匯。首先是1920年代在德國被用來分析崛起於意大利的法西斯領導人墨索裏尼,其次是1930年代在歐洲(包括納粹德國)和美國被用來...
評分卡裏斯瑪(charisma)並不是馬剋斯·韋伯(Max Weber)發明的,但被他用作宗教社會學和政治社會學的概念工具之後,成為學者和大眾媒體都廣泛使用的詞匯。首先是1920年代在德國被用來分析崛起於意大利的法西斯領導人墨索裏尼,其次是1930年代在歐洲(包括納粹德國)和美國被用來...
評分卡裏斯瑪(charisma)並不是馬剋斯·韋伯(Max Weber)發明的,但被他用作宗教社會學和政治社會學的概念工具之後,成為學者和大眾媒體都廣泛使用的詞匯。首先是1920年代在德國被用來分析崛起於意大利的法西斯領導人墨索裏尼,其次是1930年代在歐洲(包括納粹德國)和美國被用來...
評分卡裏斯瑪(charisma)並不是馬剋斯·韋伯(Max Weber)發明的,但被他用作宗教社會學和政治社會學的概念工具之後,成為學者和大眾媒體都廣泛使用的詞匯。首先是1920年代在德國被用來分析崛起於意大利的法西斯領導人墨索裏尼,其次是1930年代在歐洲(包括納粹德國)和美國被用來...
圖書標籤: 比較政治學 政治領袖 政治轉型 政治學 強勢領導
The Myth of the Strong Leader 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載