发表于2024-12-23
Good Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: animal STS
An examination of a decade and a half of political controversy, ethical debate, and scientific progress in stem cell research.
After a decade and a half, human pluripotent stem cell research has been normalized. There may be no consensus on the status of the embryo—only a tacit agreement to disagree—but the debate now takes place in a context in which human stem cell research and related technologies already exist. In this book, Charis Thompson investigates the evolution of the controversy over human pluripotent stem cell research in the United States and proposes a new ethical approach for “good science.” Thompson traces political, ethical, and scientific developments that came together in what she characterizes as a “procurial” framing of innovation, based on concern with procurement of pluripotent cells and cell lines, a pro-cures mandate, and a proliferation of bio-curatorial practices.
Thompson describes what she calls the “ethical choreography” that allowed research to go on as the controversy continued. The intense ethical attention led to some important discoveries as scientists attempted to “invent around” ethical roadblocks. Some ethical concerns were highly legible; but others were hard to raise in the dominant procurial framing that allowed government funding for the practice of stem cell research to proceed despite controversy. Thompson broadens the debate to include such related topics as animal and human research subjecthood and altruism. Looking at fifteen years of stem cell debate and discoveries, Thompson argues that good science and good ethics are mutually reinforcing, rather than antithetical, in contemporary biomedicine.
通过Stem Cell Research来论述伦理学上什么是good science,大体论点和People's Science相似,也注意到了女性等弱势群体在这一科学技术的发展,尤其在进一步商业化后可能收到的伤害,但是并没有像People's Science那样真实着眼于弱势群体,而是颇有种高高在上的你们应该这样做的感觉。也是因为作者本身的这种privilege吧,他也关注到了前者不曾关注的国际/亚洲科研竞争与研究中的动物权益问题,将这所有的concern加在一起,good science is about relations and reciprocity. (最后提到科研中我们究竟该如何对待动物的一章真心不错,克制理性,算了,改四星吧!
评分通过Stem Cell Research来论述伦理学上什么是good science,大体论点和People's Science相似,也注意到了女性等弱势群体在这一科学技术的发展,尤其在进一步商业化后可能收到的伤害,但是并没有像People's Science那样真实着眼于弱势群体,而是颇有种高高在上的你们应该这样做的感觉。也是因为作者本身的这种privilege吧,他也关注到了前者不曾关注的国际/亚洲科研竞争与研究中的动物权益问题,将这所有的concern加在一起,good science is about relations and reciprocity. (最后提到科研中我们究竟该如何对待动物的一章真心不错,克制理性,算了,改四星吧!
评分通过Stem Cell Research来论述伦理学上什么是good science,大体论点和People's Science相似,也注意到了女性等弱势群体在这一科学技术的发展,尤其在进一步商业化后可能收到的伤害,但是并没有像People's Science那样真实着眼于弱势群体,而是颇有种高高在上的你们应该这样做的感觉。也是因为作者本身的这种privilege吧,他也关注到了前者不曾关注的国际/亚洲科研竞争与研究中的动物权益问题,将这所有的concern加在一起,good science is about relations and reciprocity. (最后提到科研中我们究竟该如何对待动物的一章真心不错,克制理性,算了,改四星吧!
评分通过Stem Cell Research来论述伦理学上什么是good science,大体论点和People's Science相似,也注意到了女性等弱势群体在这一科学技术的发展,尤其在进一步商业化后可能收到的伤害,但是并没有像People's Science那样真实着眼于弱势群体,而是颇有种高高在上的你们应该这样做的感觉。也是因为作者本身的这种privilege吧,他也关注到了前者不曾关注的国际/亚洲科研竞争与研究中的动物权益问题,将这所有的concern加在一起,good science is about relations and reciprocity. (最后提到科研中我们究竟该如何对待动物的一章真心不错,克制理性,算了,改四星吧!
评分通过Stem Cell Research来论述伦理学上什么是good science,大体论点和People's Science相似,也注意到了女性等弱势群体在这一科学技术的发展,尤其在进一步商业化后可能收到的伤害,但是并没有像People's Science那样真实着眼于弱势群体,而是颇有种高高在上的你们应该这样做的感觉。也是因为作者本身的这种privilege吧,他也关注到了前者不曾关注的国际/亚洲科研竞争与研究中的动物权益问题,将这所有的concern加在一起,good science is about relations and reciprocity. (最后提到科研中我们究竟该如何对待动物的一章真心不错,克制理性,算了,改四星吧!
Good Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书