1886-1900:<br > GROWING PAINS<br >Wlhen the first issue of The Sporting News eighth, the Browns rallied for three runs to tie the<br > rolled off the press in mid.March of 1886, score. A two-run triple by Arlie Latham ~nt the 8,0..~ 0<br > major league baseball, represented by the Sportsman s Park spectators into a frenzy.<br >National League and the American Association, was In the last half of the lOth, with the score still d~td-<br >suffering from acute growing pains, locked, Curt Welch ted off and was struck by a pitch.<br > Nicholas E, Young, the fifth president of the 10- When Anson protested that Welch had stood too cl ~se<br >year.old National League, issued orders that were to the plate and made no effort to avoid the pitch, the<br >blithely ignored. Franchises were moved like pawns umpire ordered the center fielder to bat again. Welch<br >on a chessboard. Umpires, frequently recruited from promptly singled to center field and advanced to third<br >neighborhood saloons for five dollars per game, freely on an error and a sacrifice. In the hope of picking off<br >favored the home team to guarantee continued em- Welch, who was taking a big lead, Chicago catcher<br >ployment. And club executives quarreled endlessly in King Kelly signaled for a pitchout, but the pitch was<br >what was commonly referred to as the "National Pas- too high. The ball glanced off Kelly s mitt as Welch<br >time." stormed across the plate with the winning run. The<br > The dominant team in the National League in the world championship belonged to the Browns.<br >nlid, lBS0s was the Chicago White Stockings, managed "Fans went crazy over the victory," one scribe re-<br >by Adrian (Cap) Anson. Its counterpart in the Ameri- ported. "Many wept tears of joy, turned somersaults,<br >can Assodation was the St. Louis Browns, piloted by handsprings, and threw hats, umbrellas and handker-<br >Charles Cornlskey, like Arisen a first baseman, chiefs. Some made runs for the players. As each man<br > . In the faU of 1885, the two pennant-winning teams was captured in turn he would be ~arried off the field-<br > hi a seven,game series to determine the fore- Then 3,000 waited outside the dressing room and<br >most chlb ill Organized Baseball. The first .game w.as cheered each player as he reappeared."<br >pl~ed ill Chk~ago, the next three in St. Lores, one m After the game, Vonder Ahe wrote to Spalding sug-<br >Pittahurgh and two in Cincinnati. Each team won gesting an exhibition game in Cincinnati. The Chicago<br > official wanted no more of the Browns. He replied:<br > r~ $am~,~wlaile another contest ended in a tie. One<br > cage victory was a forfeit, which resulted from Co- "We must decline with our compliments. We know<br >,llliskcy,plllltng his team off the field in protest of an when we have had enough. P.S.: Anson joins me in the<br >i~ph~ s~decision, above message."<br > ~ .WIle/! tile two teams repeated as league champions Next to Anson, Michael Joseph (King) Kelly was the<br >ill t~ll~i, anothor series-this one t~r~r o~az~ and White Stockh~gs most glittering performer. In that<br >|e~J_llt01l barnstorming tour-was proposed by Chris 1886 season, the catcher-outfielder led the l~ague in<br > Von tler Abe, owner of the Browns. In a letter to AI- batting (.388) and contributed 53 stolen bases. Kelly,<br > I~rt G, $1mlding, owner of the White Stockings, Von who had a flair for the theatrical on the basepaths,<br > Abe mggttstt~l a serie6 of five, seven or nine games, prompting cries of "Slide, Kelly, slide[" from the<br > with the wfiinlng team to take all the gate receipts. The crowd, was a flee spirit with an ingenious nfind. For<br > ~hlfllon~ was accepted. The seven.game arrangement instance, King Kel is credited by some with devisin8<br > w~ ~roed upon, with the first three games to be the hit-and-run play.<br > played in Chicago and the remaining games in St. In February 1887, Kelly was sold to Boston for<br > Louis. $10,000, a shocking figure in a day when most player.~<br > The teams split the first four games before the were receiving $2,000 in annu ,d salary. Kelly agreed t~<br > Browns gained an edge in the fifth contest, 10-3. The terms with Boston quickly, not because of the $2,0~<br > sixth gmne matched John Clark.son, Chicago s 35-game figure on his contract, but because of the $3,000 that nc<br > winner against Bob Caruthers, who had won 30 deci- was offered for "the use of his picture" in team adver.<br > stons for the Browns. For seven innings, Clarkson tising,<br > hurled magnificently, allowimz no runs. but in the King Kelly s superiority on the diamond wa,<br >
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的封面设计简直是一场视觉盛宴,那种复古的字体排版和略带泛黄的纸张质感,瞬间就能将人拉回到那个遥远的年代。我迫不及待地翻开它,期望能立刻沉浸在那段光辉岁月之中。然而,当我真正开始阅读时,才发现这本书更像是一本厚重的档案汇编,而非我预想中那种引人入胜的故事集。它似乎更侧重于罗列事实、呈现大量的旧报纸剪报和数据图表,对于一个渴望了解体育界背后那些鲜活人物和戏剧性瞬间的普通读者来说,阅读过程稍显枯燥。我本以为能读到关于那些传奇运动员如何面对压力、如何与对手产生化学反应的深度剖析,或是编辑部内部关于重大体育事件报道策略的幕后花絮。书中引用的很多早期报道,虽然具有历史价值,但其叙事风格与现代新闻写作大相径庭,语言晦涩,需要花费大量精力去解读当时的社会背景和体育俚语,才能真正体会到其中的深意。对于不熟悉那个特定历史时期的读者来说,这本书的门槛略高,它更像是为资深历史学家或专业研究者准备的工具书,而不是一本能让人在咖啡馆里轻松阅读的消遣读物。我希望它能在史料的堆砌之余,能多一些生动的笔触,将那些冰冷的数据点燃,还原出那个时代运动的激情与温度。
评分阅读完这本书,我最大的感受是它提供了一个极其扎实但缺乏“温度”的参考框架。它完美地充当了“事实核查中心”,任何关于某个年份或某个冠军头衔的疑问,都能在这里找到对应的记录。然而,体育的魅力远不止于这些客观数据。它关乎情感的宣泄,关乎一代人的集体记忆,关乎那些在看台上挥洒青春的狂热瞬间。这本书在描绘这些“情境”方面显得力不从心。例如,它或许会记录下一场著名比赛的最终得分和关键球员的表现,但却无法捕捉到那个瞬间,整个城市陷入狂喜或悲痛的氛围。我希望作者能运用更多的文学手法,去描绘那些历史时刻是如何渗透进普通人生活的,体育是如何塑造了民族性格和地区认同的。这本书更像是对一个巨大体育帝国进行的高效、冷峻的财务审计报告,而非一本充满激情的、能让人感受到汗水与泪水交织的传记合集。它为历史学家提供了坚实的骨架,但对于寻求精神共鸣的普通读者来说,这副骨架显得过于清瘦和缺少血肉。
评分当我试图在书中寻找关于特定小众运动或地区性联赛的记录时,才发现其内容明显倾向于那些主流、票房号召力强的赛事和明星。这对于一本声称记录“百年”历史的综合性出版物而言,是一个可以理解的侧重,但多少也反映了一种历史书写的局限性。体育精神的多元性并未得到充分体现。那些在地方社区默默耕耘、为体育的普及做出贡献的小型联赛、业余队伍,以及那些推动边缘化运动发展的先驱人物,在书中几乎是隐形的。这种“大者恒大”的叙事方式,虽然符合商业逻辑,却让这本书在史学意义上显得不够完整和包容。我个人对那些在逆境中坚持自己运动梦想的“无名之辈”的故事抱有浓厚兴趣,他们往往更能体现体育精神的真谛——坚持、奉献与社区支持。然而,本书似乎更热衷于记录那些已然被历史高度美化的巨星事迹,而对于那些默默无闻的贡献者,则显得吝啬笔墨。因此,这本书与其说是体育史的全景图,不如说是一幅着重描绘了“大都会”和“超级明星”的画卷。
评分这本书的装帧和印刷质量,老实说,与它所承载的历史厚度并不完全匹配。考虑到其主题跨越了一个世纪的体育里程碑,我原本期望看到的是更高标准的图片处理和排版设计。许多从早期报纸上扫描下来的插图,清晰度实在不敢恭维,人物面孔模糊不清,运动场景更是难以辨认。这极大地削弱了视觉冲击力,而体育史的魅力很大程度上是依赖于那些定格的瞬间——运动员飞跃的姿态、球迷狂热的表情、胜利者振臂高呼的场景。在那个影像技术尚未成熟的年代,每一张留存下来的照片都弥足珍贵,理应得到最好的呈现。此外,版面设计显得过于密集和拥挤,缺乏足够的留白来让读者的大脑喘息和消化信息。每页都被密密麻麻的文字和表格塞满,让人在长时间阅读后产生强烈的视觉疲劳感。它仿佛是在用一种最经济的方式,把所有能找到的资料一股脑地塞进了这本有限的篇幅里,而牺牲了作为一本现代出版物应有的美感和易读性。这让我想起早年间图书馆里那些资料室的书籍,它们承载着知识,却也带着阅读上的沉重负担。
评分阅读完前三分之一,我深深体会到一种知识的重量感,但这种重量并非来自故事的跌宕起伏,而是来自其百科全书式的全面性。这本书的宏大叙事结构,试图囊括整整一百年的体育变迁,这无疑是一项艰巨的任务。然而,在试图覆盖一切的过程中,我感觉很多关键的历史节点和人物传记都被轻描淡写地带过了,如同在巨大的时间线上快速滑动。例如,某一特定时期内,某项运动规则的重大变革是如何影响球队战术和球员生涯的细节,书中仅用了寥寥数语带过,而大量篇幅却用于记录某一年份的季末排名和赞助商更迭。这种取舍让我感到有些困惑,毕竟,真正推动体育史前行的往往是那些规则和观念的根本性转变,而非仅仅是数字上的记录。我期待看到的是对这些深层驱动力的探讨,比如体育的商业化进程是如何一步步侵蚀其纯粹性的?不同社会思潮(如民权运动、两次世界大战)是如何在体育场上得到体现和反思的?这本书提供了充足的“是什么”,却在“为什么”和“怎么样”上留下了巨大的空白。它更像是一份详尽的年鉴索引,而不是一本深入剖析体育文化演变的论著,这使得整体阅读体验略显扁平化,缺乏层次感。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有